Teams

Transfer/Refund

Transfer · Refund

24 players · average NTRP 3.69 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Refund have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Audrionna Farr
published 4.5
4.19
Polly Paulsen
published
3.85
Whitney Tilson
published
3.85
Whitney Tilson
published
Emily Rizer
published 4
3.73
Jordyn Parry
published 4
3.70
Anna Tortorici
published 4
3.65
Esther Hong
published 4
3.43
Amy DeMattia
published 3.5
3.30
Kendall Gastelu
published
Elizabeth Grace
published 3.5
3.17
Tracey Thatcher
published
3.14
Christina Mott
published 3.5
3.13
Elena Danova
published 4
3.11
Sophia Yang
published
3.04
Giselle Leon
published 3
3.04
Lysa Scarselli
published 3
2.97
Halina Pavels
published 3.5
2.97
Frank Del Deo
published 3.5
LiJun Gan
published
NATALYA ORLOVA
published
Sana Sohoni
published
Vladimir Parizhsky
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina Mott + Kendall Gastelu4254% games+4.2% vs expected
Christina Mott + Amy DeMattia213 matchesnot enough data
Amy DeMattia + Kendall Gastelu213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Audrionna Farr
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Polly Paulsen
4W–1L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.19
Whitney Tilson
58W–34L career · no lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.85
Whitney Tilson
58W–34L career · no lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Emily Rizer
10W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Jordyn Parry
168W–127L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Anna Tortorici
52W–26L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Esther Hong
89W–92L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Amy DeMattia
21W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.43
Kendall Gastelu
33W–26L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Elizabeth Grace
22W–24L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tracey Thatcher
24W–22L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Christina Mott
56W–46L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
3.14
4
Elena Danova
23W–70L career · no lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.13
Sophia Yang
32W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.11
3
Giselle Leon
13W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Lysa Scarselli
132W–79L career · no lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
3.5
Halina Pavels
24W–81L career · no lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
3.5
Frank Del Deo
0W–10L career · type S · no lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.97
Laurie-Maude Chenard
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
LiJun Gan
5W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
NATALYA ORLOVA
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sana Sohoni
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Vladimir Parizhsky
14W–32L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.