Teams

FK Walsh

2025 Marion Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Adult Women 55 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-09vs Villages SchappellLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Degirolami / Susan Garrick vs Yvonne Schappell / Rene Stinnett2-6, 3-6
2025-03-02vs FK Ms. Hits - CentonzeLost 01
L#2 DoublesDiane Stablein / Susan Garrick vs Debby Watts / Beth Riendeau0-6, 2-6
2025-02-16vs SKY SpinaLost 01
L#3 DoublesJan Cole / Susan Garrick vs Heather Hagar / Peggy Ridgway3-6, 6-7
2025-02-09vs FK London -BarletWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Degirolami / Susan Garrick vs Barbara Slatton / Jan Lattimer6-1, 6-2
2025-02-02vs Villages SchappellLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Garrick / Lisa Degirolami vs Michelle Miluk / Johnnie Marston3-6, 1-6
2025-01-26vs FK Ms. Hits - CentonzeLost 01
L#2 DoublesJan Cole / Susan Garrick vs Dina Sapienza / Diana Royo4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Diane Stablein
published 4
Debra Bianculli
published 4
3.54
Lori Croy
published
3.53
Valerie Elvin
published
3.37
Marianne Marcoux
published
3.35
Mary Jeanne Walsh
published
3.25
Laura Flanagan
published
3.04
Jan Cole
published 3.5
Jill Kimball
published
Lisa Degirolami
published
Susan Garrick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Flanagan + Susan Garrick3548% gamesnot enough data
Valerie Elvin + Lori Croy5252% gamesnot enough data
Valerie Elvin + Diane Stablein4163% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diane Stablein
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Debra Bianculli
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Croy
75W–42L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
Valerie Elvin
125W–108L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.53
Marianne Marcoux
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.37
Mary Jeanne Walsh
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.35
Laura Flanagan
30W–59L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Jan Cole
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Jill Kimball
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Degirolami
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Garrick
52W–70L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.