Teams

Yadkin/De Young

2026 Yadkin Valley Mixed 18 & Over · Mixed 3.5 - Thursday Evening

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-13vs Yadkin/18+3.5 Mixed/FCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesDanielle Wright / Joseph Kulits vs Mary Crane / Josh Crane6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKristi Nicholson / Cameron Chong vs ALLISON SLOAN / Michael Sloan6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMatt Calkins / Kim Haynes vs Austin Temple / Lucie Temple3-6, 1-6
2026-08-10vs Yadkin/18+3.5 Mixed/FCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoseph Kulits / Kristi Nicholson vs Austin Temple / Lucie Temple6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-08-06vs Yadkin/Braden/Brown/18+3.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesAravindh Raj Sankara Narayanan / Clarissa Tatum vs Brad Stilwell / Dani Doerr6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHannah Giles / Cameron Chong vs Tyler Elseth / Amy Braden6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKristi Nicholson / Joseph Kulits vs Colleen Isaacson / George Pottanat6-0, 6-1
2026-07-30vs Yadkin/Clay/18+3.5 MixedWon 30
W#1 DoublesAravindh Raj Sankara Narayanan / Kristi Nicholson vs Chris Blankenship / Jocelyn Moye6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAndrew Backus / Meghan de Young vs Jeff Clay / Katelyn Chapman4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnthony Jackson / Sarah Gabriel vs Matt Crews / Katherine Heath6-2, 6-2
2026-07-09vs Yadkin/Song/18+3.5 MixedWon 20
W#1 DoublesDanielle Wright / Andrew Backus vs Adam McCord / Nora Ferrell6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesClarissa Tatum / Cameron Chong vs Melissa Faulkner / Vance Faulkner7-5, 6-3
2026-07-02vs Yadkin/Braden/Brown/18+3.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesAndrew Backus / Meghan de Young vs Lauren Hylarides / Donavan Hylarides6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDaniel Johnson / Kim Haynes vs Colleen Isaacson / Tyler Elseth6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHannah Giles / Matt Calkins vs Torin Liberthson-Brown / George Pottanat6-1, 6-1
2026-06-25vs Yadkin/Clay/18+3.5 MixedWon 30
W#1 DoublesDaniel Johnson / Hannah Giles vs Andrew Darcy / Katherine Heath6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesClarissa Tatum / James Richards vs Jocelyn Moye / Chris Blankenship4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoseph Kulits / Meghan de Young vs Renae Caldwell / Logan Caldwell7-6, 7-5
2026-06-04vs Yadkin/Song/18+3.5 MixedWon 30
W#1 DoublesDanielle Wright / James Richards vs Connie Song / Bumsoo Ahn6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Gabriel / Joseph Kulits vs Dawn Frank / JV Hipp6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKim Haynes / Aravindh Raj Sankara Narayanan vs Melissa Faulkner / Vance Faulkner6-1, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 3.5 - Thursday Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Aravindh Raj Sankara Narayanan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.67
Hannah Giles
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.61
James Richards
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.58
Clarissa Tatum
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.57
Joseph Kulits
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
3.52
Andrew Backus
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.47
Danielle Wright
published 3.5
3.47
Meghan de Young
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Kristi Nicholson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.37
Cameron Chong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Sarah Gabriel
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.29
Kim Haynes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Matt Calkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meghan de Young + Andrew Backus4162% gamesnot enough data
Clarissa Tatum + James Richards314 matchesnot enough data
Kristi Nicholson + Joseph Kulits303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Aravindh Raj Sankara Narayanan
90W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.69
3.5
Hannah Giles
38W–3L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.67
3.5
James Richards
20W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.61
3.5
Clarissa Tatum
62W–24L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.58
Joseph Kulits
22W–10L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Andrew Backus
36W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Danielle Wright
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
Meghan de Young
43W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.47
Kristi Nicholson
72W–62L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Cameron Chong
18W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
Sarah Gabriel
25W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.34
Kim Haynes
21W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
Matt Calkins
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.