Teams

EM BLUE

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-10vs GNO BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesTammy Terhaar / Meg Overstake vs Erin Chain / Meg Swearingen3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Engeman / Carol Grow vs Lauren Hillary / Cheryl Badger4-6, 2-6
2023-09-06vs GCC NAVYLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Engeman / Lindsey MClintock vs Rebecca Givens / Nicole Conroy4-6, 1-6
2023-08-23vs ATC BLUEWon 10
W#1 SinglesTammy Terhaar vs Harriet LaMair6-1, 6-0
2023-08-17vs PTC GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJanet Willson / Susan Engeman vs Myrna Sobernheim / Elizabeth Stemper5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesTammy Terhaar vs Marcela Lopez7-5, 6-1
2023-08-13vs VC REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan Engeman / Tammy Terhaar vs Karin French / Heather Lichtenfels7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2023-08-09vs CACM YELLOWSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKristen Schiffner / Susan Engeman vs Sarah Fitzgerald / Reba Tsvetkova3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesTammy Terhaar vs Jennifer Taylor6-0, 6-1
2023-08-08vs CHCC GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesJanet Willson / Susan Engeman vs Angela Lercara / Kirstin Simmons6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Tammy Terhaar
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.56
Carol Grow
published 3
2.51
Janet Willson
published
2.50
Kristen Schiffner
published
2.46
Susan Engeman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Lindsey MClintock
published
Meg Overstake
published
Rebecca Winslow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Engeman + Janet Willson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tammy Terhaar
55W–27L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
3
Carol Grow
6W–15L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
2.56
Janet Willson
8W–14L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
2.51
Kristen Schiffner
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
2.50
3
Susan Engeman
30W–62L career · type A · 6 lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.46
Lindsey MClintock
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Meg Overstake
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca Winslow
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.