Teams

GJTC JBROOM

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - WS · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - WS

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-05-18vs GJTC SDANIELSLost 02
L#1 DoublesRandy Hurshman / Jacob Heer vs Evan Wilson / Bryan Baughman6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCasper Maurer / Dave Milo vs Brian Wright / Charles Barbieri5-7, 4-6
2021-05-04vs GJTC AHOCHEVARWon 20
W#1 SinglesRandy Hurshman vs Scott Nolan4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesColby Grace / Casper Maurer vs Adam Hochevar / Edwin Messinger6-4, 6-2
2021-04-30Won 10
W#2 DoublesCasper Maurer / Lars Irion vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-04-14vs GJTC AHOCHEVARWon 20
W#1 DoublesRandy Hurshman / John Aggen vs Steve Nolan / Scott Nolan6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCasper Maurer / Colby Grace vs Adam Hochevar / Edwin Messinger2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-04-06vs GJTC SDANIELSLost 02
L#1 SinglesRandy Hurshman vs Matt Miller0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCasper Maurer / Dave Milo vs Charles Barbieri / Bryan Baughman1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Randy Hurshman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Colby Grace
published 4
3.62
Jason Broom
published
3.55
Casper Maurer
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Dave Milo
published
John Aggen
published
Lars Irion
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Randy Hurshman + Jason Broom8059% games+12.4% vs expected
Lars Irion + Jason Broom4250% games−0.2% vs expected
Lars Irion + Casper Maurer2445% games−5.8% vs expected
Casper Maurer + Randy Hurshman4545% games−6.3% vs expected
Casper Maurer + Jason Broom2347% gamesnot enough data
Lars Irion + Colby Grace224 matchesnot enough data
Casper Maurer + Colby Grace213 matchesnot enough data
John Aggen + Colby Grace033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Randy Hurshman
78W–42L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Colby Grace
11W–30L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jason Broom
28W–16L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Casper Maurer
35W–46L career · 5 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.55
Dave Milo
2W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
John Aggen
5W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Lars Irion
12W–10L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.