Teams

Kuliouou Double Trouble

2026 Tri-One Doubles League · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.83 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2026-08-29vs LUV-LUVLost 01
L#1 DoublesBiljana Baker / Susan Shintani vs Rumiko Wong / Sharon Vidal0-6, 0-6
2026-08-22vs JustLuvTennis 3.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAkiko Ooi / Miho May vs Genelynne Jian / June Chung6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-08-21vs OC Sparkly Powerpuff SquadLost 01
L#1 DoublesBonnie Moy / Miho May vs Christine KIm / Lianne Poppinga2-6, 4-6
2026-08-08vs Doubles DivasLost 01
L#1 DoublesAkiko Ooi / Susan Shintani vs Jennifer Ostachuk / Terri Mei1-6, 0-6
2026-08-02vs Bad News BunniesLost 01
L#1 DoublesBiljana Baker / PJ Ellison vs Mamta Patel / Allison Gough3-6, 0-6
2026-08-01vs Bad News BunniesLost 01
L#1 DoublesMiho May / Susan Shintani vs Sonavie Ong / Maria Wisco3-6, 2-6
2026-07-18vs OC BestiesLost 01
L#1 DoublesMiho May / Biljana Baker vs Ani Dinkova / Cynthia Rankin6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-07-12vs LUV-LUVLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Shintani / Biljana Baker vs Sharon Vidal / Sarah Kistler0-6, 0-6
2026-07-05vs JustLuvTennis 3.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesPJ Ellison / Bonnie Moy vs Xiaofei Mai / Yuko Omorai7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-28vs OC Sparkly Powerpuff SquadLost 01
L#1 DoublesAkiko Ooi / Miho May vs Christine KIm / Keiko Kratky1-6, 2-6
2026-06-21vs Doubles DivasLost 01
L#1 DoublesShina Degucci / Susan Shintani vs Shana Suzuki / Rosalynne Kakogawa-Wong1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LUV-LUV5353764
2OC Sparkly Powerpuff Squad5353877
3Bad News Bunnies4343753
4OC Besties44441190
5JustLuvTennis 3.016161383
6Kuliouou Double Trouble17171596

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.42 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.72
Miho May
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
PJ Ellison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Susan Shintani
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Bonnie Moy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.23
Shina Degucci
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.14
Akiko Ooi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.06
Biljana Baker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bonnie Moy + PJ Ellison131252% games+2.7% vs expected
Miho May + Bonnie Moy3545% gamesnot enough data
Miho May + PJ Ellison2539% gamesnot enough data
Biljana Baker + Shina Degucci033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Miho May
37W–73L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
3
PJ Ellison
45W–61L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Susan Shintani
18W–32L career · 5 lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
2.61
3
Bonnie Moy
82W–135L career · 2 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
2.54
Shina Degucci
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
2.5
Akiko Ooi
1W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
2.5
Biljana Baker
4W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.