Teams

South Shore - Happy Hour

2025 HTA Spring NA - Ladies Doubles Tuesday · 4.5 Ladies Doubles

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-25vs Lifetime Galleria - LifersLost 04
L#1 DoublesKelsey McNeil / Rebecca Nguyen vs Donna Miller / Heather Mee3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPooja Desai / Cathy Ingram vs Grace Carter / Inna Sergeeva0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Broom / Kjerstyn Hansen vs Claudia Mollerup-Madsen / Candace Craft2-6, 6-7
L#4 DoublesShannon Sobkowiak / Aimee Wilson vs Dawna Kelly / Kelly Davis1-6, 0-6
2025-03-04vs Sugar Creek - Love AllLost 02
L#1 DoublesCathy Ingram / Kellie Ohara vs Dena Day / Amanda Thompson3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Nguyen / Erika Gruber vs Leen Laricci / Justine Rosner2-6, 6-7
2025-01-28vs Lifetime Galleria - LifersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKelsey McNeil / Marie Sharp vs Dawna Kelly / Heather Mee1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesRebecca Nguyen / Erika Gruber vs Durham Kyle / Claudia Mollerup-Madsen1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Ladies Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Kelsey McNeil
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Erika Gruber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Pooja Desai
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Amanda Toudouze
published 4
3.80
Laura Broom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Aimee Wilson
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Kellie Ohara
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Cathy Ingram
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.58
Rebecca Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.49
Stashia Hardman
published
3.48
Kjerstyn Hansen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Marie Sharp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Shannon Sobkowiak
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Lenka Hurton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Nguyen + Erika Gruber12356% games+6.5% vs expected
Rebecca Nguyen + Kjerstyn Hansen4451% games+4.6% vs expected
Cathy Ingram + Kellie Ohara261356% games−0.1% vs expected
Rebecca Nguyen + Cathy Ingram2641% games−5.9% vs expected
Marie Sharp + Kellie Ohara7352% games−6.4% vs expected
Shannon Sobkowiak + Stashia Hardman5647% games−11.2% vs expected
Marie Sharp + Cathy Ingram3259% gamesnot enough data
Pooja Desai + Cathy Ingram224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelsey McNeil
20W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
4.05
Erika Gruber
48W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.96
Pooja Desai
15W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.92
4
Amanda Toudouze
22W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
Laura Broom
22W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Aimee Wilson
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kellie Ohara
100W–49L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Cathy Ingram
71W–56L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
Rebecca Nguyen
70W–72L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.58
Stashia Hardman
28W–38L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Kjerstyn Hansen
40W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.48
Marie Sharp
49W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.47
Shannon Sobkowiak
18W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.40
Lenka Hurton
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.