Teams

LATA18/Mathews/CAMP

2024 Mixed 18 & Over - USTA · 3.5 Adult Mixed Doubles

16 players · average NTRP 3.57 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-29vs LATA18 - Anderson - CAMPWon 10
W#2 DoublesBarry Mathews / Susan Mathews vs Larry Ellisor / Megan Peeples7-5, 6-1
2024-05-22vs LATA18/HUFFMAN/CAMPWon 10
W#1 DoublesBarry Mathews / Susan Mathews vs Michael Benton / Vandrea Lang6-2, 6-2
2024-05-08Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBarry Mathews / Susan Mathews vs Dawson Thornton / Amber Bryant5-7, 4-6
2024-05-01vs LATA18/Serba/LCTCWon 10
W#1 DoublesBarry Mathews / Danielle Peeler vs Stefanie Carpenter / Kaden Watson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Danielle Peeler
published 3.5
3.56
Mark Rugg
published
3.52
Barry Mathews
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.50
Susan Mathews
published
3.41
Gerald Simpson
published
3.39
Cindy Bane
published 3.5
3.37
Kemper Amick
published
3.32
Terrance Wingfield
published
3.31
Celia Keenan
published 3.5
3.26
Becky Piper
published 3.5
3.21
Chandler Price
published 3.5
2.90
Molly Price
published
Jessica Hallman
published
John Pierce
published
Kate Ratterree
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Mathews + Barry Mathews17360% games+7.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brandon Ratterree
14W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Danielle Peeler
48W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.64
Mark Rugg
38W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Barry Mathews
212W–65L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.52
Susan Mathews
39W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
Gerald Simpson
117W–43L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Cindy Bane
81W–31L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
Kemper Amick
27W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.37
Terrance Wingfield
42W–26L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Celia Keenan
18W–22L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Becky Piper
36W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Chandler Price
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
Molly Price
27W–10L career · no lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
2.90
Jessica Hallman
44W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
John Pierce
52W–44L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kate Ratterree
8W–25L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.