Teams

PVIC - Coffing

2024 Duval Adult 18 & Over - Women · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-30vs Club Continental - DonnellyLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoann Welborn / Kathy Parker vs Claudia Grosskruger / Donna Marceau6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-06-09vs Southside - GennermanWon 10
W#2 SinglesJoann Welborn vs Lillian Cutaj6-1, 6-0
2024-05-19vs Baymeadows - LansangWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Wise / Joann Welborn vs Britta Messler / Annalee Lansang3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-04-28vs Boonedocks - HarrisLost 02
L#1 DoublesJayne Coffing / Joann Welborn vs Carol Merritt / Lani Baruch2-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesBeth Dombroski vs Stephanie Vihlen2-6, 3-6
2024-04-21vs Club Continental - DonnellyWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeth Dombroski / Joann Welborn vs Amy Balsimo / Amber Moorman3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-04-14Won 10
W#1 SinglesBeth Dombroski vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Elizabeth Ross
published
3.86
Betsy McNeill
published 4
3.79
Beth Dombroski
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Heather LaPrade
published 4
3.77
Pamela Alpert
published
3.76
Kathy Parker
published
3.75
Jayne Coffing
published
3.68
Julie Henderson
published
3.63
Julie Kelly
published
3.53
Jenny Meide
published
3.51
Joann Welborn
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.47
Jennifer Wise
published
Elizabeth Burke
published
Margaret Desaussure
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joann Welborn + Beth Dombroski213 matchesnot enough data
Joann Welborn + Heather LaPrade213 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Parker + Pamela Alpert303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Ross
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Betsy McNeill
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Beth Dombroski
26W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Heather LaPrade
101W–76L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Pamela Alpert
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Kathy Parker
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
Jayne Coffing
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Julie Henderson
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Julie Kelly
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.63
Jenny Meide
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.53
Joann Welborn
50W–46L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.51
Jennifer Wise
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.47
Elizabeth Burke
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Margaret Desaussure
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.