Teams

Veltri/Sara

2024 Broward TriLevel · 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.21 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-09-03vs Dillon/LorenLost 01
L#1 DoublesRENEE ALEXIS / Paulina Riveros vs Ivy Touchstone / Hania Majzoub3-6, 4-6
2024-08-26vs Sunrise/MoratoWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Herrera / RENEE ALEXIS vs Amber Yan Mueller / Rosa Waters6-3, 6-2
2024-08-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesSamie Lesperance / RENEE ALEXIS vs Kumiko Currie / Gretchyn Wagner7-6, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Samie Lesperance
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.25
Camille Naranjo
published 4.5
4.21
RENEE ALEXIS
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.92
Paulina Riveros
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.82
Lissette Viloria
published
3.79
Garbine de la Mora
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.73
Taciana Kalili
published
3.70
Andrea Cepero
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Ili Montnor
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
2.53
Sara Contreras
published
Jody Julmice
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paulina Riveros + Andrea Cepero10755% games+6.4% vs expected
Ili Montnor + Garbine de la Mora25760% games−0.4% vs expected
Samie Lesperance + RENEE ALEXIS6245% games−3.0% vs expected
Garbine de la Mora + Samie Lesperance12556% games−4.6% vs expected
Andrea Cepero + Garbine de la Mora6157% gamesnot enough data
Paulina Riveros + Ili Montnor314 matchesnot enough data
Paulina Riveros + Garbine de la Mora134 matchesnot enough data
Paulina Riveros + Samie Lesperance314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Samie Lesperance
247W–110L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Camille Naranjo
76W–24L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
4.25
4.5
RENEE ALEXIS
92W–123L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%93%1%
4.21
4
Paulina Riveros
110W–62L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.92
Lissette Viloria
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Garbine de la Mora
284W–129L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.79
Taciana Kalili
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Andrea Cepero
325W–163L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Ili Montnor
168W–92L career · 4 lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.63
Sara Contreras
20W–28L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
2.53
Jody Julmice
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.