Teams

HANSEN 4.5 WINTER 2026

2026 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 4.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 4.38 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-11vs McDonald 4.5 18+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAnna Nguyen / Savannah Olson vs Michele Bailey / Michaela Schulz0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesClare Palen / Nina Lind vs Jacqueline Dutot / Elisabeth Walker5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBrenda Martinson / Natalie Allison vs Taylor Jackson / Rachel LaTour1-6, 1-6
2026-03-04vs Estey-Alexander 4.5 - W2026Won 30
W#1 DoublesEmma Wu / Noelle Dougan vs Marti Estey / Sofia Terzic6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesNina Lind / Isabella Taleon vs Mona Oenning / Cristina Kazda6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrenda Martinson / Clare Palen vs Lori Mosser / Kristine Paul6-0, 6-0
2026-02-25vs Opfer/Wahlstrand 4.25Lost 14
L#1 DoublesNoelle Dougan / Emma Wu vs Carolyn Dahlman / Alana Whiteley6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesFaith Dougan vs Mallory Lithun3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNina Lind / Isabella Taleon vs Britt Weber / Carol Wahlstrand7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Carlisle vs Hayley Helberg0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKatie Fleming / Emily Walz Lockhart vs Beci Bjornson / Gina Boyer6-2, 6-4
2026-02-11vs Buhr 4.5 WinterWon 31
W#1 DoublesSavannah Olson / Emma Wu vs Theresa Harich / Maura Smiley3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNina Lind / Noelle Dougan vs Margaret Kelley / Rhonda Greene7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesFaith Dougan vs Jennifer Magnuson6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBrenda Martinson / Katie Fleming vs Lynda Stout / Shelley Wagener3-6, 1-6
2026-02-04vs MansfieldWon 32
W#1 DoublesDilcia Stromberg / Noelle Dougan vs Andrea Peterson / Karen Feagler7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesFaith Dougan vs Sydney Rott6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNina Lind / Isabella Taleon vs Kelsey Aden / Lana Pinnock6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesClare Palen vs Alexis Junker6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKatie Fleming / Emily Walz Lockhart vs Janice Ring / Suzy Griffith2-6, 6-7
2026-01-28vs Jorgenson-Bowles Point TakenWon 41
W#1 DoublesSavannah Olson / Emma Wu vs Alesha Baerenwald / Kristin Hartley6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesFaith Dougan vs Isabel Thiner6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDana Hansen / Julia Rodd vs Kristin Nesseth / Thao Nguyen Nguyen3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Carlisle vs Julie Bowles6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKatie Fleming / Emily Walz Lockhart vs Jessica Schnabel / Betsy Sedlak6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-01-14vs Estey-Alexander 4.5 - W2026Split 22
L#1 DoublesSavannah Olson / Nina Lind vs Marti Estey / Cecilia Grass-Neary4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJulia Rodd / Emma Wu vs Molly Hemes / Andrea Boado6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesNatalie Allison vs Amanda Hiatt6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesNoelle Dougan / Faith Dougan vs Genevieve Swanson / Cristina Kazda5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2026-01-07vs Opfer/Wahlstrand 4.25Lost 13
L#1 SinglesFaith Dougan vs Mallory Lithun5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNoelle Dougan / Dilcia Stromberg vs Patrice Meger / Carolyn Dahlman4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesNina Lind vs Gina Boyer6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSara Ormseth / Julia Rodd vs Carol Wahlstrand / Lauren Welch6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Buhr 4.5 Winter62281233333
2HANSEN 4.5 WINTER 202644211942335
3Estey-Alexander 4.5 - W202635142657402

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.47
Clare Palen
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.35
Emma Wu
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.17
Nina Lind
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
4.14
Dana Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Natalie Allison
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.09
Julia Rodd
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.09
Faith Dougan
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
4.06
Dilcia Stromberg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.01
Emily Walz Lockhart
usually #2 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
3.99
Noelle Dougan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.95
Pamela Moeller
published
3.92
Brenda Martinson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Katie Fleming
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Sara Ormseth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Savannah Olson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Isabella Taleon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Elizabeth Carlisle
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Savannah Olson + Emma Wu8160% games+14.1% vs expected
Noelle Dougan + Pamela Moeller2356% games+8.6% vs expected
Dilcia Stromberg + Pamela Moeller11031% games−20.8% vs expected
Dilcia Stromberg + Noelle Dougan134 matchesnot enough data
Dilcia Stromberg + Katie Fleming224 matchesnot enough data
Noelle Dougan + Nina Lind224 matchesnot enough data
Noelle Dougan + Emma Wu134 matchesnot enough data
Noelle Dougan + Faith Dougan044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Clare Palen
12W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
4.47
Emma Wu
33W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
4.35
Nina Lind
14W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Dana Hansen
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%1%
4.14
Natalie Allison
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
4.10
Julia Rodd
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.09
Faith Dougan
6W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.09
4.5
Dilcia Stromberg
9W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
4.06
Emily Walz Lockhart
53W–14L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
4.01
Noelle Dougan
26W–45L career · 6 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.99
Pamela Moeller
11W–26L career · no lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
3.95
4
Brenda Martinson
12W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
Katie Fleming
33W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
Sara Ormseth
25W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Savannah Olson
24W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
3.67
Isabella Taleon
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
Elizabeth Carlisle
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.