Teams

RCCB - Vickers

2025 Brevard Trilevel · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.30 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-06vs Fee - LuerWon 10
W#1 DoublesCuc Nguyen / Erin Vickers vs Kimberly Kressler / Kim Tice6-2, 6-3
2025-07-30vs Kiwi - CarlsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin Vickers / Cuc Nguyen vs Anne Ramsey / Tracy Famiano7-6, 6-0
L#1 DoublesBrandi Maratta / Cuc Nguyen vs Beth Wolfram / Susan Douglas6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-07-16vs Fee - LuerWon 10
W#1 DoublesCuc Nguyen / Brandi Maratta vs Kim Tice / Elizabeth Meredith7-6, 6-1
2025-07-09vs Kiwi - CarlsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesCuc Nguyen / Brandi Maratta vs Anne Ramsey / Maria Diegnan3-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesCuc Nguyen / Brandi Maratta vs Tee Wells / Susan Douglas6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-06-25vs Fee - LuerWon 10
W#1 DoublesCuc Nguyen / Brandi Maratta vs Kim Tice / Elizabeth Meredith6-0, 6-3
2025-06-18vs Kiwi - CarlsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesAngela Duckworth / Cuc Nguyen vs Angila Burke / Danielle Carlson6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Cuc Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Angela Duckworth
published 3.5
3.20
Sue Lutter
published
3.10
Erin Vickers
published
2.98
Brandi Maratta
published 3.5
2.94
Melissa Vickers
published
2.78
Erin Schlitts
published
2.75
Rachel Gould
published
2.75
Brenda Tarquinio
published 3
2.72
Allison Moorhead
published 3
2.52
Jenifer Raymond
published
2.50
Lael Woods
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Schlitts + Melissa Vickers5068% games+8.9% vs expected
Rachel Gould + Erin Schlitts134 matchesnot enough data
Lael Woods + Brenda Tarquinio213 matchesnot enough data
Brenda Tarquinio + Melissa Vickers303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cuc Nguyen
110W–58L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Angela Duckworth
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Sue Lutter
20W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20
Erin Vickers
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Brandi Maratta
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
Melissa Vickers
20W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.94
Erin Schlitts
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Rachel Gould
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Brenda Tarquinio
22W–8L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Allison Moorhead
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Jenifer Raymond
17W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%44%56%
2.52
Lael Woods
18W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%49%51%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.