Teams

UPTA54/Murry/Cardinal

2024 Fall 54 & Over-Women-UPTA · 3.0 Women FF

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-21vs UPTA55FF/Tassin/Keowee KeySplit 11
W#1 DoublesChimene Evans / Sandi Tolly vs Patricia Passapera-Muehling / Annette Aldridge6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCatherine Murry / Johnel Searcy vs Marla Queen / Lorra Tassin4-6, 2-6
2024-11-06vs UPTA54+FF/Lawson/HollyTreeWon 20
W#1 DoublesSandi Tolly / Chimene Evans vs Gretchen Lawson / Tarah M Smith6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCatherine Murry / Carol Shrum vs Sandra Wright / Susan San Francisco6-3, 6-1
2024-10-23vs Keowee Key/Party at the NetLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine Murry / Chimene Evans vs Nancy Lenkowski / Laurie Sinkele6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSandi Tolly / Johnel Searcy vs Tish Fontana / Lisa Weinstein6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesSheila Voigt / Rebecca Mazzone vs Joyce Brooks / Carol Austin0-6, 4-6
2024-10-16vs UPTA54+FF/Lawson/HollyTreeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSandi Tolly / Carol Shrum vs Tarah M Smith / Lea Blanchard6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSheila Voigt / Catherine Murry vs Diane Zeager / Melanie DeWitt2-6, 2-6
2024-10-09vs UPTA55FF/Tassin/Keowee KeyWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarol Shrum / Sandi Tolly vs Muriel Rankin / Kirsten Zinkann6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRebecca Mazzone / Chimene Evans vs Marla Queen / Annette Aldridge6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine Murry / Kyra Roberts vs Susan Hufnagle / Cindy Register6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women FF have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Sandi Tolly
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.81
Kyra Roberts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Carol Shrum
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Catherine Murry
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.73
Chimene Evans
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.63
Rebecca Mazzone
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.44
Sheila Voigt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Johnel Searcy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Murry + Kyra Roberts224 matchesnot enough data
Kyra Roberts + Chimene Evans134 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Mazzone + Chimene Evans123 matchesnot enough data
Sandi Tolly + Carol Shrum303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandi Tolly
17W–11L career · 5 lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.12
Kyra Roberts
17W–25L career · 1 line in 2024
1%89%9%
2.81
3
Carol Shrum
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Catherine Murry
7W–14L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Chimene Evans
21W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Rebecca Mazzone
5W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
2.63
Sheila Voigt
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
2.44
Johnel Searcy
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.