Teams

EM YELLOW

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-19vs WP-C YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesBriana Rimkus / Abby Munn vs Elle Jackson / Emma Rabusch1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAmanda Yates vs Allison Blue2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRachel Retzke / Suzanne Cota vs Logan Wilson / Amy Sumner2-6, 1-6
2026-08-12vs DTC GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmanda Yates / Mika Gans vs Katie Reilly / Kara Leibowitz1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAngie Beatty vs Tameron Kazdal3-6, 2-6
2026-08-05vs DTP PINKWon 20
W#1 DoublesAngie Beatty / Mika Gans vs Heidi Yarger / Emili Gross6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBriana Rimkus / Abby Munn vs Dianne Johnson-Pape / Krystal McGhie7-5, 6-3
2026-07-29vs CM GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesAbby Munn / Briana Rimkus vs Nicole Edwards / FIONA PENNEY3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSuzanne Cota vs Kate Levy3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAmanda Yates / Marcy Mendenhall vs Julie McLaughlin / Catherine Charles1-6, 0-6
2026-07-22vs WP BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesAngie Beatty / Mika Gans vs Katherine Paganucci / Cindy Koch7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesBriana Rimkus vs Julie Behrman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 1.99 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.21
Suzanne Cota
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.04
Mika Gans
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.03
Abby Munn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.96
Angie Beatty
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
1.87
Amanda Yates
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
1.81
Briana Rimkus
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Marcy Mendenhall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel Retzke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angie Beatty + Mika Gans2340% games−3.7% vs expected
Abby Munn + Briana Rimkus224 matchesnot enough data
Abby Munn + Amanda Yates033 matchesnot enough data
Abby Munn + Angie Beatty033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suzanne Cota
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
Mika Gans
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
2.5
Abby Munn
3W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
2.5
Angie Beatty
4W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96
2.5
Amanda Yates
0W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.87
2.5
Briana Rimkus
3W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.81
Marcy Mendenhall
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Rachel Retzke
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.