← Teams

CGM-Logan

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
John Hapke
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
John Wallin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Augustin Belindean
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Jon Peters
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Rolf Ellingsen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Steve Thunstedt
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Hayward Reed
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
—
Kimbal Logan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Results7 ties
2022-10-30Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesMark Muckerheide / Kimbal Logan vs Pierre Burthey / David Visse6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRick Raivio / Rolf Ellingsen vs Robert Shevlin / Eric Anderson4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJohn Wallin / Augustin Belindean vs Michael Siebers / Bruce Trubo6-3, 7-5
2022-10-29Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesJon Peters / Lynn Marzette vs Brian Cormier / Clay Funkhouser6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Wallin / Augustin Belindean vs Aaron Bowman / Jim Mounts6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHayward Reed / Kimbal Logan vs Ken Dragoon / Jerry Garland6-3, 6-1
2022-10-22Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesHayward Reed / Jon Peters vs Allen VanLeuven / Victor Regner6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAugustin Belindean / John Wallin vs Vincent Robertson / Martin Jeffrey Binns6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRolf Ellingsen / John Hapke vs Min Lee / Dave Kuhns4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-10-16Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesSteve Thunstedt / Jon Peters vs Matt Curtis / Bill Henderson6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRick Raivio / John Wallin vs Steven Christenson / Brad Harrington6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Hapke / Mark Muckerheide vs Lawrence Reichman / Dave Hall6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2022-09-24Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesSteve Thunstedt / Jon Peters vs Doyoung Moon / Daniel M Kim6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRick Raivio / Rolf Ellingsen vs Chinwoo Kim / JIN PARK6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesHayward Reed / Augustin Belindean vs Joong Kim / Von Kim6-2, 7-5
2022-09-17Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesJohn Hapke / Steve Thunstedt vs Frank Foti / Patrick Kirk6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKimbal Logan / Augustin Belindean vs Randolph Splitter / Tim Anderson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-09-11Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesAugustin Belindean / Steve Thunstedt vs Brady Berry / Shawn Boyce6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRolf Ellingsen / Mark Muckerheide vs David Williams / Craig Frasier6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHayward Reed / Kimbal Logan vs Jeff Wheeler / Todd McConachie6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
John Hapke
81W–77L career
0%97%2%
3.32
3.5
John Wallin
66W–61L career
5%91%4%
3.27
3.5
Augustin Belindean
28W–23L career · type S
not enough data
—
3.5
Jon Peters
33W–36L career · type M
8%87%5%
3.25
3.5
Rolf Ellingsen
43W–38L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Steve Thunstedt
32W–46L career · type S
25%74%1%
3.09
3
Hayward Reed
34W–32L career
not enough data
—
3
Kimbal Logan
39W–57L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.