Teams

Eckholdt/55's/3.5/FAC Day

2026 Man · Cov Adult 55 & Over - Women Day

8 players · average NTRP / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings5 teams · Cov Adult 55 & Over - Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Chassee/55's/3.5/SC Day8021313171
2Eckholdt/55's/3.5/FAC Day53121229221
3Ricalde/55's/3.5/PAC Day4415921176
4Morris/55's/3.5/SC Day3591535246
5Tracey/55's/3.5/NC Day0832142260

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Karen Magee
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Kimberly Coogan
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published
Linda Goudeau
usually #1 Doubles 61%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Lisa Keiffer
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Lynn Durant
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Rhonda Eckholdt
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Suzanne Allison
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Wendy Morise
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Goudeau + Suzanne Allison5358% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Durant + Kimberly Coogan224 matchesnot enough data
Lynn Durant + Karen Magee033 matchesnot enough data
Rhonda Eckholdt + Suzanne Allison303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Magee
2W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kimberly Coogan
4W–7L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Linda Goudeau
24W–21L career · 28 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Keiffer
5W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lynn Durant
8W–11L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rhonda Eckholdt
30W–23L career · 29 lines in 2026
not enough data
Suzanne Allison
27W–12L career · 24 lines in 2026
not enough data
Wendy Morise
10W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.