Teams

Whichard 18s 6.5M Combo Mon PM

2026 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 18 & Over Men - Monday PM

13 players · average NTRP 3.29 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-24vs Snyder 18s 6.5M Combo Mon PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesLee Schneiderman / Arthur Gardiner vs Gene LeFevre / Michael Clapp6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKevin Grubb / Dan Horan vs David Grubbs / Gabriel Snyder6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPeter Uber / Bryan Bly vs Jeff Cunningham / Jason Lewis7-6, 7-6
2026-08-10vs Hilliard 18s 6.5M Combo Mon PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesLuke Mulvey / Chris Whichard vs Robert Davis / Jason Slate2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChris Werling / Dan Horan vs Felipe Gonzalez / BRAD VANNOY4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLee Schneiderman / Peter Uber vs Chris Sigley / Will Brown4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 18 & Over Men - Monday PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Kevin Grubb
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Bryan Bly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Stephen Moore
published
3.32
Bill Watson
published 3.5
3.30
DAREN BARNES
published 3.5
3.25
Luke Mulvey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Lee Schneiderman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Chris Werling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Arthur Gardiner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.05
Peter Uber
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Dan Horan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Chris Whichard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Eric McFarlin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

DAREN BARNES + Bill Watson14758% games+13.3% vs expected
DAREN BARNES + Chris Whichard2351% games+7.7% vs expected
Chris Whichard + Dan Horan314 matchesnot enough data
Luke Mulvey + Kevin Grubb303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Grubb
33W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
3.40
3.5
Bryan Bly
37W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
Stephen Moore
27W–8L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Bill Watson
27W–28L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
DAREN BARNES
29W–20L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Luke Mulvey
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Lee Schneiderman
21W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Chris Werling
16W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
8%90%1%
3.20
3
Arthur Gardiner
20W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.15
Peter Uber
24W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Dan Horan
29W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Chris Whichard
25W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
Eric McFarlin
32W–22L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.