Teams

Sarasota Sports Club Windsor

2021 Sarasota Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 W Saturday

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-03-20vs GT Bray Corby CorpsLost 01
L#2 DoublesKimberly Stockdale / Zora Trujic vs Terry Olsen / Lisa Simotes3-6, 3-6
2021-03-13vs Payne Park PipesLost 01
L#3 DoublesZora Trujic / Cyndi Weitzel vs Jane Oskin / Randi Broida6-7, 2-6
2021-03-13vs Sarasota - Cedars/LevyLost 02
L#2 DoublesZora Trujic / Jo Anne Cullen vs Kim Towe / Cindy Davis5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJacqueline Moore / Cyndi Weitzel vs MARIA FERNANDA LLOYD / Mae Preston0-6, 0-6
2021-02-27vs LWN ArringtonLost 01
L#3 DoublesZora Trujic / Cyndi Weitzel vs Deana Antonelli-Pike / Teri Arrington2-6, 4-6
2021-02-06vs Sarasota - Cedars/LevyLost 01
L#3 DoublesJacqueline Moore / Zora Trujic vs MARIA FERNANDA LLOYD / Debra Williams4-6, 2-6
2021-01-23vs GT Bray Corby CorpsLost 01
L#3 DoublesZora Trujic / Cyndi Weitzel vs Lisa Simotes / Terry Olsen1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Kathy Sawyer
published
3.40
Elizabeth Micek
published 3.5
3.36
Polina Windsor
published
3.33
Brittany Blackman
published 3.5
3.24
Tatiana Agafonova
published 3.5
2.94
Cyndi Weitzel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Zora Trujic
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jacqueline Moore
published 3
Jo Anne Cullen
published
Jo Kleindienst
published
Linda Evans
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zora Trujic + Cyndi Weitzel4744% gamesnot enough data
Polina Windsor + Elizabeth Micek134 matchesnot enough data
Linda Evans + Jo Anne Cullen123 matchesnot enough data
Brittany Blackman + Polina Windsor213 matchesnot enough data
Brittany Blackman + Cyndi Weitzel123 matchesnot enough data
Zora Trujic + Kathy Sawyer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathy Sawyer
2W–10L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Elizabeth Micek
22W–18L career · no lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
3.40
Polina Windsor
13W–16L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Brittany Blackman
61W–56L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Tatiana Agafonova
27W–41L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3
Cyndi Weitzel
73W–73L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Zora Trujic
59W–71L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Jacqueline Moore
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jo Anne Cullen
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jo Kleindienst
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Linda Evans
8W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.