Teams

LA - LA Rounders

2024 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Men 5.0+

11 players · average NTRP 5.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-12-11vs LA-LLW-Sets on Fire-Debbie HalimLost 02
L#1 DoublesCameron Coe / Hans Hettich vs Maalik Konop-Defreitas / Henry Mak3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesGreg Bekkers vs Brett Buford0-6, 3-6
2024-11-03vs LA-LLW-Sets on Fire-Debbie HalimLost 01
L#1 DoublesGreg Bekkers / Jeremy Mitchell vs Parker Duda / Maalik Konop-Defreitas2-6, 2-6
2024-10-27vs LA - Team QuanLost 03
L#1 DoublesLucas Chmielewski / Tatsuya Ishizuka vs Eric Lee / Joseph Lok1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKEISUKE ABIKO vs Hunter Kettering5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGreg Bekkers / Andrew Ong vs Javeed Kassam / Stefan Cutovic6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-10-19vs LA-LLW-Sets on Fire-Debbie HalimWon 10
W#2 DoublesGreg Bekkers / Jeremy Mitchell vs Miguel Cepeda / Tuji Chang6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Men 5.0+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.61 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Ong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.72
Cameron Coe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.70
Charlie Werman
published 5
4.68
KEISUKE ABIKO
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.52
Gilbert Guevara
published
4.51
Hans Hettich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.51
Tatsuya Ishizuka
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Greg Bekkers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Jeremy Mitchell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lucas Chmielewski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Gopaoco
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeremy Mitchell + Greg Bekkers123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Andrew Ong
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
5
Cameron Coe
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
no projection at this level
4.72
5
Charlie Werman
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.70
KEISUKE ABIKO
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
no projection at this level
4.68
Gilbert Guevara
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.52
Hans Hettich
11W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
4.51
Tatsuya Ishizuka
5W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
no projection at this level
4.51
Greg Bekkers
1W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeremy Mitchell
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lucas Chmielewski
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Peter Gopaoco
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.