Teams

SLMOR-Ortiz/RR 40 4.0 Thurs am

Lake USTA 40 & Over Summer Singles · Women 4.0 40+

6 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 SinglesMaryGwen Murash vs Lisa Schacher6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesJanet Szilagyi vs Linda Radovich7-6, 6-3
2025-07-24vs SLKAT-Atkins/Pen Club SinglesWon 10
W#1 SinglesMaryGwen Murash vs Alicia Bowman6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAmy Ward vs Kristine Bienstock6-3, 6-1
2025-07-03Won 20
W#1 SinglesJanet Szilagyi vs Danielle Mikolajczyk6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAmy Ward vs Kim Rummelsburg6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMeredith Ortiz vs Linda Radovich1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesAmy Ward vs Katrina Childers6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesMaryGwen Murash vs Janet Harmon6-1, 6-3
2025-06-12vs SLKAT-Atkins/Pen Club SinglesWon 20
W#2 SinglesMeredith Ortiz vs Kim Rummelsburg6-3, 4-0
W#3 SinglesJanet Szilagyi vs Shannon Hirschfeld6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 40+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Amy Ward
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.84
Janet Szilagyi
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.61
MaryGwen Murash
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.54
Kathleen Navola
published
3.34
Meredith Ortiz
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Laura Wansley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MaryGwen Murash + Meredith Ortiz4258% gamesnot enough data
Laura Wansley + Amy Ward213 matchesnot enough data
MaryGwen Murash + Amy Ward303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Ward
243W–97L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Janet Szilagyi
196W–83L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
MaryGwen Murash
133W–111L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
Kathleen Navola
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Meredith Ortiz
123W–106L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Laura Wansley
37W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.