Teams

MLong-DUR

2026 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 Over Adult 3.0 Men Evening

11 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-16vs CLynch-DURLost 23
W#1 DoublesRick Edmunds / Robert Long vs Tom Luben / Kevin Winn6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBen Alper vs Joseph Davis1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCharles McMillan / Steven Rochkind vs Adrian Laros / Jordan Nader7-6, 6-1
L#2 SinglesChristopher LeGrand vs Gregory Downing2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTravis Angle / Mark Rhoades vs David Bautz / Stuart Beeson7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2026-04-09vs RYasin-DURLost 13
L#1 DoublesSteven Rochkind / Travis Angle vs Harrison Bailey / Carlton Hadebe6-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMatthew Davies vs Brandon van Buren6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRick Edmunds / Mark Rhoades vs Jeff Heinz / Jeff Pobst3-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesCharles McMillan vs Adam Williamson2-6, 0-6
2026-04-03vs KBuckel-EVWon 21
W#1 DoublesRick Edmunds / Matthew Davies vs Keith Buckel / Aaron Young6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRobert Long / Christopher LeGrand vs Stephen Pysnik / Reggie Oakley6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesBen Alper vs Leon Grodski Barrera6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-26vs JByrd-DURLost 04
L#1 DoublesCharles McMillan / Rick Edmunds vs Andrew Adams / Quincy Jones2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBen Alper vs Pearson Wynands3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Rochkind / Christopher LeGrand vs Dennis Byrd Jr / Stacy Bowden1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMatthew Davies vs Blake Jensen4-6, 4-6
2026-03-19vs MAlimohammadi-DURLost 12
W#1 DoublesRick Edmunds / Travis Angle vs Freddie Bell / Ryan Maloney6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMatthew Davies vs Nick Gill4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Long / Steven Rochkind vs Sam El Hafez / Jerry Wang5-7, 6-7
2026-03-12vs SBurger-DURWon 32
W#1 DoublesRick Edmunds / Robert Long vs Venkat Ravi / John Donahue7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBen Alper vs Stanislav Kukhniy6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesChristopher LeGrand / Steven Rochkind vs Alex Stoffregen / Jesse DeConto5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesCharles McMillan vs Aaron Alejandro0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMark Rhoades / Travis Angle vs Steven Burger / Michael Berro6-1, 6-3
2026-03-05vs CGilley-CHCCSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMark Rhoades / Christopher LeGrand vs Lucas Beal / Anton Manasco6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesBen Alper vs Juan Munster1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRick Edmunds / Robert Long vs Corey Hansen / Scott Davies0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSteven Rochkind / Charles McMillan vs Tom Wollman / Carlos Quintero6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-02-12vs MBland-CHTCWon 32
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Scott Taylor / Travis Angle vs Ed Slanker / Marcelo Straus Takahashi5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesBen Alper vs Brett Tracy6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobert Long / Steven Rochkind vs Grant Richter / Nigel Slanker7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCharles McMillan vs Jianwen Chen2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMark Rhoades / Christopher LeGrand vs Rayan Joneydi / Richard Samulski6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 Over Adult 3.0 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Rick Edmunds
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.88
Robert Long
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Matthew Davies
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.83
Christopher LeGrand
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.78
Mary T Long
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
2.76
Travis Angle
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.72
Ben Alper
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 2.5
2.70
Mark Rhoades
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.58
Charles McMillan
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
2.55
Steven Rochkind
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Jeffrey Scott Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Long + Rick Edmunds3545% games−0.9% vs expected
Christopher LeGrand + Mark Rhoades224 matchesnot enough data
Robert Long + Steven Rochkind033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Rick Edmunds
76W–92L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.03
Robert Long
13W–29L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Matthew Davies
12W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Christopher LeGrand
3W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Mary T Long
27W–68L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Travis Angle
4W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
2.5
Ben Alper
4W–3L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
0%6%94%
2.72
Mark Rhoades
6W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
2.5
Charles McMillan
7W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%29%71%
2.58
Steven Rochkind
5W–36L career · 7 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.55
Jeffrey Scott Taylor
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.