Teams

Williamson, Greg

2026 Combo 18 & Over-JXN · Men 7.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.86 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-27vs Hosemann, JDWon 21
W#1 DoublesGreg Williamson / Robert Williams vs JD Hosemann / Bryton Hixson6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAkhilesh Ganti / Clayton Muller vs Dante Grant / Justin Rhodes1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGraham Bucciantini / Jackson Pullen vs Jay Irving / John Patton4-6, 3-6
2026-08-20vs Nguyen, TamLost 12
L#1 DoublesDarius Walker / Julio Morales vs Albert Smith / Travis Donald3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGraham Bucciantini / Stan Fisher vs Jason McKnatt / Rehan Ali2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesClayton Muller / Robert Williams vs Kevin McKay / Charles Bailey6-1, 6-2
2026-08-06vs Hosemann, JDLost 12
L#1 DoublesJackson Pullen / Clayton Muller vs Bryton Hixson / Ben Berry4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Foley / Robert Williams vs Dante Grant / John Patton6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMatt Carpenter / Darius Walker vs Thomas Thigpen / Bain Foote4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-08-03vs Do, DawsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesMatthew Stacy / Greg Williamson vs Dawson Do / Chandler Strain4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNeal Stephens / Clayton Muller vs Loren Eaton / Anthony Covington1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Do, Dawson1142451
2Williamson, Greg0103637

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Clayton Muller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.57
Dario Rosa
published 4
3.56
Greg Williamson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Michael Foley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Graham Bucciantini
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.35
Darius Walker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.34
Stan Fisher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Akhilesh Ganti
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Julio Morales
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Jackson Pullen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Akhilesh Ganti + Greg Williamson1636% games−4.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Clayton Muller
16W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Dario Rosa
12W–37L career · no lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Greg Williamson
13W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.56
Michael Foley
12W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
4
Graham Bucciantini
2W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
3.37
4
Darius Walker
1W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
3.35
Stan Fisher
55W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Akhilesh Ganti
5W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
Julio Morales
50W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Jackson Pullen
29W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.