Teams

Sarasota/Weitzel/40&Over4.0M

2023 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Winter Weekend · 4.0 M Saturday

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-25Won 10
W#3 DoublesPeter Laughlin / John Laforge vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-18vs LWN OsherLost 01
L#3 DoublesPeter Laughlin / Jim Capazola vs Jonathan Cranos / David Arrowood3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-03-06vs Laurel Oak RosenbergWon 10
W#1 DoublesKip Schoonover / Peter Laughlin vs Tim Mihm / Dustin Keith6-2, 6-3
2023-02-25vs LWN OsherSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJim Capazola / Peter Laughlin vs Jim Fiumefreddo / Marc Pommainville6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGregory Childers / Gustavo Risquez vs Larry Denyes / Thiago Domingues4-6, 0-6
2023-02-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPeter Laughlin / Gustavo Risquez vs Vivek Kumar / Paul Jaworski6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-02-16vs LWN OsherLost 01
L#3 DoublesJim Capazola / Peter Laughlin vs Marc Pommainville / Jim Fiumefreddo5-7, 2-6
2023-01-28vs Laurel Oak RosenbergWon 10
W#1 DoublesPeter Laughlin / Calvin Hac vs DONALD LAGASSE / Kenneth Schwartz6-3, 6-2
2023-01-14vs LWN OsherWon 10
W#1 DoublesPeter Laughlin / Jim Capazola vs Larry Denyes / Jonathan Cranos6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Gustavo Risquez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Calvin Hac
published 4
3.73
Kip Schoonover
published
3.73
Peter Laughlin
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.64
Eric Abbott
published
3.60
RON NOURSE
published
2.95
Cyndi Weitzel
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Gregory Childers
published
Jim Capazola
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lance Schilling
published
William Rhodes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Laughlin + Gustavo Risquez2450% gamesnot enough data
Jim Capazola + Peter Laughlin224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gustavo Risquez
206W–174L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Calvin Hac
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kip Schoonover
13W–8L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Peter Laughlin
76W–45L career · 8 lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.73
Eric Abbott
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.64
RON NOURSE
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
3
Cyndi Weitzel
73W–73L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
2.95
Gregory Childers
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jim Capazola
78W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lance Schilling
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
William Rhodes
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.