Teams

Pinellas - Seminole Lake/Tightly Strung

2022 Pinellas Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.0 W Saturday

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-26Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMaggie Berning vs Erin Chenderlin2-6, 5-7
2022-03-19vs SPTC BernishWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristine Price / Meg DeSomery vs Melissa Wirt / Chris Pruett6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMaggie Berning vs Frances Skinner7-6, 6-2
2022-03-12vs Tarpon WeisslerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChristine Price / Elizabeth Jordan vs Susan Sommerfield / Laura Baker7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMaggie Berning vs Judy Carlin2-6, 2-6
2022-03-05vs ELW AnkneyWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Price / Elizabeth Jordan vs Kimberly Ankney / Robyn Houston7-6, 6-1
2022-02-19vs ELW SolaWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristine Price / Sue Francis vs ROBIN TILTON / Julie Kalter6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMaggie Berning vs Betsy Rutkowski6-2, 6-0
2022-02-12vs SPTC BernishWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Price / Maggie Berning vs Melissa Wirt / Chris Pruett7-6, 6-4
2022-01-29vs Tarpon WeisslerWon 20
W#1 SinglesMaggie Berning vs Robyn Crane6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesChristine Price / Sue Francis vs Laura Baker / Mary Garrido6-2, 6-0
2022-01-15vs ELW SolaWon 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Jordan / Maggie Berning vs Betsy Rutkowski / Michele Sullivan6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Jennifer Gibson
published
3.08
Meg DeSomery
published
3.08
Sue Francis
published
3.04
Maggie Berning
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.02
Christine Price
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
2.92
Erica Allums
published 3
2.81
Asheley Wardell
published 3
2.62
Patty Anderson
published
2.48
Sonia Agee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Gibson + Meg DeSomery4158% games−1.3% vs expected
Maggie Berning + Christine Price314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Gibson
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%20%80%
3.61
Meg DeSomery
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
Sue Francis
2W–15L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
Maggie Berning
50W–40L career · 7 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Christine Price
99W–86L career · 8 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Erica Allums
8W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Asheley Wardell
9W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
2.81
Patty Anderson
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
2.62
Sonia Agee
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.