Teams

UPTA55M/Johnson/Kroc

2026 UPTA Mixed 55 & Over - USTA · 55+ Mixed - 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-25vs UPTA55A/Baker/ACACLost 12
L#1 DoublesTracy Churdar / Mark Diblin vs Gerardo Modestti / Julie Branham2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrian Friedman / Kimberly Halley vs Adam Thompson / Lisa Mlady2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJonathan Doyle / Ty Warlick vs Brad Meredith / Tracie Segura6-7, 1-6
2026-06-24vs UPTA55M/DeCarbo/ReserveSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSteve Mills / Jane Trexler vs Joe Bernitt / Sherry Morgan6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesShaun Friedman / Brian Friedman vs Mark Apsey / Lisa Apsey2-6, 4-6
2026-06-11vs UPTA (A) 3.5M 55 & Over (Koban)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Wolf / Ty Warlick vs Roland Fournier / Tarina Mendes3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAmy Ryberg Doyle / Jonathan Doyle vs Jeff Buturff / Vilma Billinis1-6, 0-6
2026-06-04vs UPTA55M/Neri/Keowee KeyWon 21
W#1 DoublesShaun Friedman / Brian Friedman vs Bernard Blide / CRYSTAL BLIDE4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMissy Lawlor / Jack Lawlor vs Ralph Mosca / Sharon Thomas2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesFrancine Holmes / Michael Wolf vs Wendy Jakszta / Kenneth Uhlig6-3, 6-4
L#1 DoublesTracy Churdar / Michael Wolf vs Jon Holmes / Susan Krzeminski5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMark Diblin / Kimberly Halley vs Sara Mower / Mark Barnes2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJane Trexler / Steve Mills vs Rebecca Gruendling / Dave Federspiel6-7, 5-7
2026-05-21vs UPTA55M/McGee/GCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesMark Diblin / Kimberly Halley vs Rod McGee / Cindy Cannon4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrian Friedman / Shaun Friedman vs David Seaver / Carrie Ann Twedt2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJack Lawlor / Missy Lawlor vs Larry Conn / Danette Kabas5-7, 2-6
2026-05-15vs UPTA55M/Troso/BrookstoneSplit 11
W#1 DoublesShaun Friedman / Brian Friedman vs Pieter Swanepoel / Carol Douglas6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAmy Chapman / Scott Dickey vs David Fisher / Deana Fisher0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 55+ Mixed - 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA (A) 3.5M 55 & Over (Koban)6115614160
2UPTA (W) 3.5M 55 & Over (Gruendling)6115614167
3UPTA55M/DeCarbo/Reserve6115616165
4UPTA55A/Baker/ACAC43111022192
5UPTA55M/Troso/Brookstone34101126196
6UPTA55M/McGee/GCC2561530215
7UPTA55M/Johnson/Kroc1661534238
8UPTA55M/Neri/Keowee Key0761533224

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Ty Warlick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Tracy Churdar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Mark Diblin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Francine Holmes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Scott Dickey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Kimberly Halley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Steve Mills
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Michael Wolf
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Jane Trexler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Amy Ryberg Doyle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Missy Lawlor
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jack Lawlor
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jonathan Doyle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shaun Friedman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Missy Lawlor + Jack Lawlor0529% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ty Warlick
22W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Tracy Churdar
21W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Mark Diblin
10W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
Francine Holmes
144W–86L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
Scott Dickey
8W–50L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
Kimberly Halley
10W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Steve Mills
1W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.03
Michael Wolf
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.99
Jane Trexler
27W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Amy Ryberg Doyle
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
Missy Lawlor
12W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.77
Jack Lawlor
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jonathan Doyle
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shaun Friedman
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.