Teams

RTC Slice

Adult 18 & Over Early Start League · 4.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTHERN ARIZONA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-11-13vs ES-Serve AcesLost 12
L#2 DoublesAdam Lazarewicz / Jay Young vs Nishantha Maliyagoda / Myls Miller1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesSasha Taleban vs Michael George0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDan McManus / Matthew McManus vs Timothy Baker / John Haberbush6-4, 6-3
2021-11-07vs ES-Serve AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesDan McManus / Matthew McManus vs Nishantha Maliyagoda / Shawn Shen6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJay Young vs Michael George6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2021-10-30vs ES-Serve AcesLost 02
L#1 DoublesDan McManus / Matthew McManus vs Andrew Kilpatrick / Myls Miller6-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSasha Taleban vs Steven Bui1-6, 1-6
2021-10-28vs ES-Serve AcesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMatthew McManus / James Park vs Christopher Jester / Andrew Kilpatrick6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDan McManus / Jay Young vs Michael George / Shawn Shen5-7, 5-7
2021-10-21vs ES-Serve AcesLost 12
L#1 DoublesJames Park / Jay Young vs Timothy Baker / Nishantha Maliyagoda6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDan McManus / Matthew McManus vs Andrew Kilpatrick / Shawn Shen6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesSasha Taleban vs Robert Paul Baker2-6, 2-6
2021-10-14vs ES-Serve AcesLost 02
L#1 DoublesDan McManus / Matthew McManus vs Steven Bui / Andrew Kilpatrick4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesClifton Nelson / Jay Young vs Robert Paul Baker / John Haberbush2-6, 2-6
2021-10-10vs ES-Serve AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesDan McManus / Matthew McManus vs Steven Bui / Shawn Shen6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJay Young vs Michael George7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ES-Serve Aces52211432275
2RTC Slice25142148359

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bronson Cudgel
published 4.5
3.64
Jay Young
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.59
Sasha Taleban
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Adam Lazarewicz
published 3.5
Dan McManus
published
Matthew McManus
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew McManus + Jay Young6259% games+12.5% vs expected
Adam Lazarewicz + Sasha Taleban033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bronson Cudgel
12W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jay Young
65W–67L career · 6 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
Sasha Taleban
9W–37L career · 3 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Adam Lazarewicz
1W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Dan McManus
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Matthew McManus
33W–43L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.