Teams

V - Royal Girlfriends

2021 SoCal Doubles 18 &Over · Ventura - Women 3.0 WE

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-12-11vs V - Las Posas AngelsWon 10
W#1 DoublesPatricia Ameca / Barb Jepson vs Yvette Hays / Kristen Sickle6-4, 6-0
W#1 DoublesPatricia Ameca / Marilyn Germann vs Nina Ahuja / Mary Ann Fermin6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKathryn Pisaro / Barb Jepson vs Maria Dickey / Katherine Weckhurst6-3, 7-6
2021-11-20vs V - Wood Ranch Match PointSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGizelda Parr / Barb Jepson vs Kelley Bannon / Mary Coladonato4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCynthia Clark / Kathryn Pisaro vs Meegan Hamilton / Valerie Gilliam6-1, 6-2
2021-10-30vs V - Valle Lindo Volley GirlsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPatricia Ameca / Marilyn Germann vs Jacqueline Francis / Alicia Sim6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCatherine Haywood / Kathryn Pisaro vs Judith Cade / Arlene Monnar6-7, 3-6
2021-10-17vs V - LLW-SunsetOohLaLa-J PruettLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarilyn Germann / Barb Jepson vs Jean Bridges / Susan Consoletti2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBeth Bloomfield / Patricia Ameca vs Janice Pinnell / Sarah Radford7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLinda Egan / Kathryn Pisaro vs Raymi Schwartz / Beatriz Rivera2-6, 3-6
2021-10-02vs V - Malibu Racquet ClubSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPatricia Ameca / Marilyn Germann vs Holly Culhane / Tammy Reilly6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCynthia Clark / Gizelda Parr vs Shelly Crema / Alexandra Tr3-6, 2-6
2021-09-25vs V - Sunset AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesKathryn Pisaro / Cynthia Clark vs Nora Valentino / Ok Hee Kolwitz6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBeth Bloomfield / Patricia Ameca vs Alejandra Featherston / Rhonda Cohen6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.0 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Patricia Ameca
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Marilyn Germann
published
2.79
Kathryn Pisaro
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.75
Barb Jepson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.45
Gizelda Parr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barb Jepson + Gizelda Parr7652% games+4.2% vs expected
Kathryn Pisaro + Barb Jepson4745% gamesnot enough data
Kathryn Pisaro + Gizelda Parr033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Patricia Ameca
113W–92L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
3.46
Marilyn Germann
9W–22L career · no lines in 2021
17%82%<1%
3.12
3
Kathryn Pisaro
74W–90L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Barb Jepson
70W–61L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
2.5
Gizelda Parr
44W–77L career · 2 lines in 2021
0%66%34%
2.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.