Teams

KTC Christman

2024 OH OV SUMMER Combo · 8.5 Combo Men

15 players · average NTRP 4.12 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-11vs STC SchroederWon 20
W#1 DoublesDonovan Christman / Adam Beiersdorfer vs Jonathan Westfall / Brian Grant6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRichard Heilman / Jack Smallwood vs David Ehlers / Alex Ehlers7-6, 6-4
2024-07-21vs STC SchroederWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndrew Schulz / Luke Hoban vs Jonathan Westfall / Zach Clendenen6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesNathan Fullington / Wilbur Lin vs Dominic Marino / Jeffrey Dunker6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDonovan Christman / Adam Beiersdorfer vs Chad Arnett / Isaac Anderson6-1, 6-4
2024-07-14vs STC SchroederWon 21
W#1 DoublesGopal Bhat / Andrew Linden vs Jonathan Westfall / Zach Clendenen6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAdam Beiersdorfer / Donovan Christman vs David Ehlers / Alex Ehlers6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChris Schlater / Richard Heilman vs Jeffrey Dunker / Stephen Coates6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-06-16vs STC SchroederWon 21
L#1 DoublesGOBINATH BALASUBRAMANIAN / Donovan Christman vs Brian Grant / Stephen Coates1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRyan Maurer / Luke Hoban vs Richard Miller / Michael Puthoff7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJack Smallwood / Enrico Ferri vs Jeffrey Dunker / Chad Arnett6-3, 7-6
2024-06-02vs STC SchroederWon 21
L#1 DoublesLuke Hoban / Chris Schlater vs Brian Grant / Stephen Coates1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesWilbur Lin / Nathan Fullington vs David Ehlers / Alex Ehlers4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRichard Heilman / Andrew Schulz vs Chad Arnett / Isaac Anderson6-1, 6-4
2024-05-19vs STC SchroederWon 30
W#1 DoublesReid Wynkoop / Nathan Fullington vs Jonathan Westfall / Michael Puthoff6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrew Linden / Ryan Maurer vs Brian Grant / Stephen Coates7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGopal Bhat / Enrico Ferri vs Austin Justice / Chad Arnett6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 8.5 Combo Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KTC Christman6014410142

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.47
Donovan Christman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
4.43
Reid Wynkoop
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.38
Luke Hoban
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.32
Andrew Linden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.27
Wilbur Lin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.11
Enrico Ferri
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Gopal Bhat
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.83
Ryan Maurer
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.79
Adam Beiersdorfer
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.77
GOBINATH BALASUBRAMANIAN
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Nathan Fullington
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Andrew Schulz
published 4
3.74
Chris Schlater
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Jack Smallwood
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Richard Heilman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gopal Bhat + Adam Beiersdorfer8454% games+9.9% vs expected
Enrico Ferri + Adam Beiersdorfer2647% games+5.1% vs expected
Gopal Bhat + Enrico Ferri10952% games+3.4% vs expected
Luke Hoban + Richard Heilman4351% gamesnot enough data
Donovan Christman + Adam Beiersdorfer314 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Linden + Wilbur Lin404 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Linden + Richard Heilman224 matchesnot enough data
Chris Schlater + Richard Heilman033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Donovan Christman
97W–16L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
4.47
Reid Wynkoop
56W–11L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%70%30%
4.43
Luke Hoban
75W–47L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
4.38
4.5
Andrew Linden
37W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
4.32
Wilbur Lin
44W–25L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.27
Enrico Ferri
112W–73L career · 2 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
4.11
Gopal Bhat
123W–60L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
3.92
Ryan Maurer
94W–35L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Adam Beiersdorfer
132W–60L career · 8 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
GOBINATH BALASUBRAMANIAN
55W–46L career · 1 line in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Nathan Fullington
48W–35L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Andrew Schulz
27W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Chris Schlater
74W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
Jack Smallwood
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Heilman
43W–64L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.