Teams

Carroll-KCC

*2022 Adult 40 & Over 3.0 - 4.5 NoHo Women · 4.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.58 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Elizabeth Matz
published 4
3.59
Jenny Carroll
published
3.56
Mi Ae Roll
published
3.45
Stacey Emmons
published
3.31
Danielle Stephens
published 3.5
3.27
Elissa Fontenot
published 3.5
Elizabeth van Uden
published 3.5
3.25
Beth MacE
published 3.5
3.18
Diane Chisam
published 3.5
3.17
Maribel Perrin
published
Jenna Liming
published
Kimberly Majerus
published
Natalie Kaple
published
Paula Heimler
published
Tami Kuykendall
published
Tanya Robinson
published
Wendy Tillis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenny Carroll + Elissa Fontenot2347% gamesnot enough data
Maribel Perrin + Natalie Kaple123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Matz
17W–25L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
Jenny Carroll
15W–25L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.59
Mi Ae Roll
20W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%33%67%
3.56
Stacey Emmons
2W–10L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.45
3.5
Danielle Stephens
13W–32L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Elissa Fontenot
5W–14L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Elizabeth van Uden
1W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Beth MacE
13W–26L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Diane Chisam
8W–19L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Maribel Perrin
9W–31L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Jenna Liming
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kimberly Majerus
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Natalie Kaple
13W–24L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Paula Heimler
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tami Kuykendall
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tanya Robinson
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Wendy Tillis
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.