Teams

Mozingo/Womack/PC/Foothills

2026 Foothills Spring 40 & Over League · Men 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-12vs Qualifier TeamWon 20
W#1 DoublesMark Eckard / Kip Place vs Eric Geyer / Adam Hansen6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKevin Whitener / Phillip Early vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-04-12vs Qualifier TeamWon 30
W#1 SinglesRamsey Dellinger vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKevin Lickman / Kevin Whitener vs JASON WINFIELD / Adam Hansen7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKip Place / Phillip Early vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-04-12Won 10
W#3 DoublesKevin Lickman / Kevin Whitener vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-04-12Won 10
W#3 DoublesKevin Lickman / Phillip Early vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-04-11vs Qualifier TeamSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRamsey Dellinger / Phillip Early vs Mitch Parry / Eric Geyer6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesClay Dennis / Mark Eckard vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
3.44
Clay Dennis
published 3.5
3.37
Kevin Whitener
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Duane Mozingo
published
3.32
Josh Wood
published
3.32
Ramsey Dellinger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Mark Eckard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Kip Place
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Robert Womack
published
3.19
Phillip Early
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Kevin Lickman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Whitener + Ramsey Dellinger3450% games−1.3% vs expected
Phillip Early + Kip Place2542% games−5.8% vs expected
Mark Eckard + Ramsey Dellinger3647% games−10.7% vs expected
Mark Eckard + Phillip Early6850% gamesnot enough data
Kevin Whitener + Phillip Early314 matchesnot enough data
Mark Eckard + Kip Place303 matchesnot enough data
Phillip Early + Ramsey Dellinger123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Douglas Lee Honeycutt Jr
20W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Clay Dennis
4W–0L career · no lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Kevin Whitener
43W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
Duane Mozingo
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
Josh Wood
15W–6L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Ramsey Dellinger
63W–83L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Mark Eckard
48W–71L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Kip Place
22W–52L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.22
Robert Womack
8W–9L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Phillip Early
44W–71L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.19
Kevin Lickman
73W–43L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.