Teams

Heritage Bay / VanKleeck

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-02-11vs Naples YMCA / HeckertWon 30
W#1 DoublesRob Arnold / Dan Latendre vs David Sousa / Tom Folger6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPeter Goffe / Kyle VanKleeck vs Gerhard Sohns / Jim Manos6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAllan Alexander / Andre Raymond vs Kurt Schwammle / Wolfgang Koester6-2, 6-3
2025-01-28vs flight winner/C.Young/55&Over7.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesDan Latendre / Rob Arnold vs Joe Groeller / Mark Tice6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKyle VanKleeck / Dave Shober vs Rick Hazan / Mark Murphy6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesPatrick Kelly / Patrick Shea vs Lance Doolittle / Jim Cohn7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 DoublesDan Latendre / Rob Arnold vs Steven Warner / Brian Fitzpatrick6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDave Shober / Patrick Kelly vs Paul Tedeschi / Joe Longo4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAndre Raymond / Allan Alexander vs William Stanhope / Craig Leclair6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Dan Latendre
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Dave Shober
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Allan Alexander
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Andre Raymond
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kyle VanKleeck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Patrick Shea
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Goffe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rob Arnold
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
William Petrillo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kyle VanKleeck + Dave Shober404 matchesnot enough data
Kyle VanKleeck + Rob Arnold123 matchesnot enough data
Rob Arnold + Allan Alexander213 matchesnot enough data
Rob Arnold + Dan Latendre213 matchesnot enough data
Allan Alexander + Peter Goffe123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dan Latendre
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Dave Shober
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Allan Alexander
5W–4L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Andre Raymond
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kyle VanKleeck
23W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patrick Shea
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Peter Goffe
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rob Arnold
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Petrillo
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.