Teams

A18 2.5W GR1 Foster

2022 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over · NEOTA A18&O 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.62 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-07-19vs A18 2.5W SH1 OppermanWon 30
W#1 DoublesVal Belcher / Louise Dapoz vs Ellie Opperman / Amanda Mattingly6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesGinger Neely vs Angela Blatz6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPamela Kelley / Bonnie Tongate vs Jacqueline Snyder / Chassity Pence6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-07-12vs A18 2.5W LT1 BurgessLost 03
L#1 DoublesPamela Kelley / Rosemarie Amore vs Dana Weber Noffsinger / Debra Yakubek0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesGinger Neely vs Julia Euclide3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBonnie Tongate / Annette Foster vs Jodie Grasgreen DeLamatre / Deb Rutzky0-6, 0-6
2022-06-07vs A18 2.5W SH1 OppermanWon 30
W#1 DoublesVal Belcher / Kelly Shaw vs Anne Morrow / Kelly Widders6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesGinger Neely vs Ellie Opperman6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPamela Kelley / Annette Foster vs Chassity Pence / Angela Blatz6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2022-05-31vs A18 2.5W LT1 BurgessLost 12
W#1 DoublesLouise Dapoz / Pamela Kelley vs Sloane Burgess / Valerie Bonacci6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesVal Belcher vs Doris Tomko2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesErin Kestner / Bonnie Tongate vs Tracy Haver / Debra Yakubek0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA A18&O 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Ginger Neely
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.89
Val Belcher
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Bonnie Tongate
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.16
Erin Kestner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.64
Annette Foster
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Louise Dapoz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Pamela Kelley
published
Rosemarie Amore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ginger Neely + Val Belcher111349% games+11.1% vs expected
Annette Foster + Erin Kestner0634% games−4.9% vs expected
Bonnie Tongate + Erin Kestner0630% games−9.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ginger Neely
69W–84L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
2.90
Val Belcher
60W–75L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
2.89
2.5
Bonnie Tongate
3W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Erin Kestner
7W–29L career · 1 line in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.16
2.5
Annette Foster
2W–24L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
1.64
Louise Dapoz
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Pamela Kelley
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rosemarie Amore
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.