Teams

Broward/Montgomery/55&Over6.0W

2025 Broward Adult 55 & Over 6.0 · 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.10 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Juan Yang
published
3.07
Raquel de Jesus
published 3.5
3.01
Shamena Khan
published 3
2.84
Maritza Craig
published 3
2.76
Tania Kiger
published
2.75
Maria Diaz
published
2.73
Jennifer Montgomery
published
2.64
Maureen Winick
published
2.59
Patricia Williams
published
2.58
Veronica Cornell
published 3
2.52
Analia Verano
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juan Yang + Maritza Craig8269% games+16.9% vs expected
Maria Diaz + Jennifer Montgomery2343% games−1.5% vs expected
Shamena Khan + Raquel de Jesus10357% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Williams + Shamena Khan123 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Williams + Maureen Winick033 matchesnot enough data
Veronica Cornell + Maureen Winick123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Juan Yang
13W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.15
3.5
Raquel de Jesus
66W–52L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
3
Shamena Khan
133W–140L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Maritza Craig
113W–116L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Tania Kiger
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Maria Diaz
6W–14L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Jennifer Montgomery
11W–26L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Maureen Winick
5W–16L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.64
Patricia Williams
11W–17L career · no lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
2.59
3
Veronica Cornell
19W–27L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58
3
Analia Verano
4W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.