Teams

ACAC Neumann

2023 Richmond Adult 55 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-31vs Raintree CooperLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarol Hoefer / Beth Farnsworth vs Lisa Harmon / Bridget Westhoven4-6, 3-6
2023-07-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCarol Hoefer / Beth Farnsworth vs Deborah Eldridge / Robin Cox1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-07-17vs SCC LaneWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarol Hoefer / Elisebeth Gelardi vs Kristin Kim / Heather Benedetti6-2, 6-3
2023-07-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesCarol Hoefer / Judy Duke vs Sheryl Highfill / Annette King6-3, 6-2
2023-06-05vs ACAC LockhartWon 10
W#1 DoublesJudy Duke / Carol Hoefer vs Kimberly Giancaspro / Susan Lockhart3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Elisebeth Gelardi
published 3.5
3.14
Beth Farnsworth
published 3.5
2.99
Carol Hoefer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Karen Grimes
published
2.95
Hilary Brodsky
published 3.5
2.91
Cynthia Edelman
published 3.5
Judy Duke
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elisebeth Gelardi
97W–88L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Beth Farnsworth
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Carol Hoefer
145W–146L career · 5 lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
2.99
Karen Grimes
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
2.95
3.5
Hilary Brodsky
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.95
3.5
Cynthia Edelman
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.91
Judy Duke
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.