Teams

CSRC RAMIREZ

2023 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - SOCO · MIXED 9.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 4.60 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-19Lost 01
L#2 DoublesHarold Woods / Kira Woods vs Jon New / Karen Jensen7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-05-16vs MEMPK HENRYWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Buerschen / Rebecca Martin vs Hunter Renn / Shawna Walker7-5, 6-4
2023-05-07vs MEMPK HENRYWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Buerschen / Shirley Stange vs Chandler Walden / Vicky Mediate6-4, 6-1
2023-04-23vs MEMPK DANIELSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJohn Buerschen / Shirley Stange vs Frank Coyle / Karen Jensen6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRebecca Martin / Harold Woods vs Jon New / Judy Flaherty5-7, 4-6
2023-04-16vs MEMPK HENRYWon 10
W#1 DoublesHarold Woods / Shirley Stange vs Chandler Walden / Vicky Mediate6-4, 6-2
2023-04-02vs MEMPK DANIELWon 10
W#1 DoublesHarold Woods / Kira Woods vs Denton Desquitado / Reagan Simons6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 9.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.69
Candace Vering
published 5
4.41
Harold Woods
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.29
John Buerschen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.22
Patrick Ramirez
published
4.18
Abby Runda
published 4.5
4.17
Shirley Stange
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.12
Rebecca Martin
published
3.80
Russell Walters
published
Kevin Runda
published
Kira Woods
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Harold Woods + Kira Woods3358% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Candace Vering
7W–0L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.69
4.5
Harold Woods
62W–26L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
<1%73%26%
4.41
4.5
John Buerschen
28W–17L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
4.29
Patrick Ramirez
16W–15L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Abby Runda
11W–20L career · type S · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Shirley Stange
57W–35L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%88%1%
4.17
Rebecca Martin
14W–24L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
4.12
Russell Walters
7W–27L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
Kevin Runda
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kira Woods
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.