Teams

Holtmann - Over Served

2026 NOVA Combo · NOVA Combo 8.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.14 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings3 teams · NOVA Combo 8.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Frazier - Serve Me A Double000000
2Holtmann - Over Served000000
3Gray - LadyBallers 8.5000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Christine Becer
published 4.5
4.12
Anne Polino
published 4.5
4.06
Rebecca Davenport
published
3.88
Erin Kaplan
published 4
3.78
Carolyn Greis
published 4
3.75
Cara Holtmann
published 4
3.74
Jeanne Baily
published 4
3.66
Anita Wilson
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanne Baily + Carolyn Greis171152% games+5.5% vs expected
Cara Holtmann + Carolyn Greis16660% games+4.5% vs expected
Cara Holtmann + Anita Wilson2550% games−3.8% vs expected
Christine Becer + Carolyn Greis1443% gamesnot enough data
Cara Holtmann + Christine Becer303 matchesnot enough data
Cara Holtmann + Jeanne Baily123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christine Becer
271W–177L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Anne Polino
26W–31L career · no lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
4.12
Rebecca Davenport
14W–7L career · no lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
4.06
4
Erin Kaplan
40W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.88
4
Carolyn Greis
584W–372L career · no lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Cara Holtmann
205W–133L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Jeanne Baily
339W–236L career · no lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Anita Wilson
33W–41L career · no lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.