Teams

Catherine Daily

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - MAGIC VALLEY · Women 3.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 2.93 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-01vs Wendy DavisLost 05
L#1 DoublesApril O'Berg / Rachel Kirchmeyer vs Elizabeth Lassen / Kim Ward1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCaroline Eggerth vs Melany Hilarides2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEvelyn Perez / Julie Taylor vs Ivonne Cummins / Janet Roe1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAnna Linzy vs Kelsey Skinner0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKristina Garrison / Danielle Taylor vs Pat Struchen / Matlin Bawden6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-17vs Wendy DavisSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKristina Garrison / April O'Berg vs Judy Graf / Janet Roe5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAnna Linzy vs Matlin Bawden6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAmy Bearden / Julie Taylor vs Elizabeth Lassen / Pat Struchen3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRachel Kirchmeyer / Evelyn Perez vs Wendy Davis / Anna Egbert6-1, 6-1
2026-06-15vs Wendy DavisLost 13
L#1 DoublesAmy Bearden / Evelyn Perez vs Judy Graf / Janet Roe0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCaroline Eggerth vs Kelsey Skinner3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesRachel Kirchmeyer / Kristina Garrison vs Anna Egbert / Wendy Davis6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCatherine Daily / Danielle Taylor vs Matlin Bawden / Ivonne Cummins7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2026-06-03vs Wendy DavisLost 13
L#1 DoublesApril O'Berg / Danielle Taylor vs Kim Ward / Elizabeth Lassen2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCaroline Eggerth vs Kelsey Skinner4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRachel Kirchmeyer / Anna Linzy vs Ivonne Cummins / Matlin Bawden6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKristina Garrison / Catherine Daily vs Anna Egbert / Wendy Davis3-6, 2-6
2026-05-20vs Wendy DavisLost 04
L#1 DoublesAmy Bearden / Rachel Kirchmeyer vs Connie Maughan / Judy Graf1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCaroline Eggerth vs Kelsey Skinner2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Daily / Kristina Garrison vs Pat Struchen / Janet Roe1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesApril O'Berg vs Ivonne Cummins5-7, 4-6
2026-05-06vs Wendy DavisLost 14
L#1 DoublesKristina Garrison / Julie Taylor vs Judy Graf / Connie Maughan0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCaroline Eggerth vs Kelsey Skinner1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesWendy Smith / Rachel Kirchmeyer vs Kim Ward / Janet Roe4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesDanielle Taylor vs Melany Hilarides0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAnna Linzy / Evelyn Perez vs Wendy Davis / Matlin Bawden6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 3.0 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wendy Davis6023716187
2Catherine Daily0652550330

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Evelyn Perez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.68
Rachel Kirchmeyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Kristina Garrison
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Amy Bearden
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Caroline Eggerth
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.60
April O'Berg
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.48
Catherine Daily
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.48
Julie Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.46
Anna Linzy
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.44
Danielle Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
Julie Mcarthur
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Taylor + Catherine Daily033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Evelyn Perez
3W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
Rachel Kirchmeyer
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Kristina Garrison
1W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.63
3
Amy Bearden
7W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
3
Caroline Eggerth
0W–7L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
3
April O'Berg
0W–14L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Catherine Daily
13W–59L career · 3 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
3
Julie Taylor
3W–20L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48
2.5
Anna Linzy
4W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%62%38%
2.46
3
Danielle Taylor
0W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.44
Julie Mcarthur
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.