Teams

GEPTA-9.0-MX-18(Garcia)(EPTC#4)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-08-04vs GEPTA/Hobbs/18&overMX/9.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesIan Sparkman / Kopal Rodriguez vs Eve Daniels / Eric Jurecky1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2024 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Hobbs/18&overMX/9.08120719223
2GEPTA/Maese/18&overMX/9.07218921220
3GEPTA-9.0-MX-18(Garcia)(EPTC#4)27101739270
4GEPTA-9.0-MX-18(Duarte)(EPTC#2)1862147313

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.35 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Ian Sparkman
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
4.37
Courteney Park
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.36
Abraham Gandarilla
usually #1 Doubles 32%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4.5
4.27
Daniela Ito
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
Erika Delgado
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Kopal Rodriguez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lacey Alost
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Marco Gonzalez Friedl
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Rene Archuleta
usually #2 Singles 39%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published
Susana Elias
usually #2 Doubles 48%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Timothy Cantrell
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
Vianka Sanchez
usually #1 Doubles 48%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lacey Alost + Vianka Sanchez2445% games−1.1% vs expected
Lacey Alost + Susana Elias224 matchesnot enough data
Vianka Sanchez + Susana Elias404 matchesnot enough data
Daniela Ito + Susana Elias314 matchesnot enough data
Timothy Cantrell + Susana Elias033 matchesnot enough data
Susana Elias + Rene Archuleta123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ian Sparkman
13W–13L career · 7 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.38
4.5
Courteney Park
71W–17L career · 21 lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
4.37
4.5
Abraham Gandarilla
71W–41L career · 26 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
4.36
4.5
Daniela Ito
46W–24L career · 10 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.27
Erika Delgado
107W–52L career · 23 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kopal Rodriguez
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Lacey Alost
27W–27L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marco Gonzalez Friedl
83W–113L career · 24 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rene Archuleta
54W–23L career · 18 lines in 2024
not enough data
Susana Elias
108W–65L career · 21 lines in 2024
not enough data
Timothy Cantrell
43W–58L career · 13 lines in 2024
not enough data
Vianka Sanchez
67W–50L career · 23 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.