Teams

Alachua - Haile/Aces Wild

2021 Alachua Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-05-22vs DB - GilsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesMarisa McLeod / Patricia Carek vs Christa Arnold / Christine Emery1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-05-21vs DB - GilsonWon 10
W#3 DoublesHelen Ingmarsson / Heather Gibson vs Lori Harrison / Kjerstin Terry6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2021-05-08vs WS - McLaughlinWon 20
W#2 DoublesMarisa McLeod / Patricia Carek vs Jennine Brandt / Lindy Archambeau6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMarie Trabbic / Amy Yazdanpour vs Laurie McLaughlin / Jigisha Shah7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2021-05-07vs 300 - ZaldivarWon 10
W#3 DoublesVinata Vedam-Mai / Helen Ingmarsson vs Maria Zaldivar / Laura Trefry4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2021-04-29vs DB - EdelsteinLost 01
L#3 DoublesMarisa McLeod / Susan Chase vs Andrea Love / Rhoda Wilburn4-6, 4-6
2021-04-27Won 20
W#2 DoublesChristine Gaynor / Amy Yazdanpour vs Cindy Richardson / Christine Borden6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGina Dell / Helen Ingmarsson vs Jill Womble / Patricia Bolser6-0, 6-4
2021-04-01vs WS - McLaughlinWon 10
W#2 DoublesMarisa McLeod / Patricia Carek vs Laurie McLaughlin / Lindy Archambeau4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Kim Magee
published
3.44
Susan Chase
published
3.43
Terri Lowery
published
3.41
Heather Gibson
published 4
3.35
Kannika Torres
published
3.25
Gina Dell
published 3.5
3.20
Amy Yazdanpour
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Vinata Vedam-Mai
published
3.16
Patricia Carek
published
3.12
Lori Herman
published
2.98
Vicki Johnson
published
2.94
Helen Ingmarsson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Marisa McLeod
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terri Lowery + Gina Dell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Magee
11W–13L career · no lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.53
Susan Chase
10W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%69%31%
3.44
Terri Lowery
24W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
3.43
4
Heather Gibson
6W–4L career · no lines in 2021
75%25%<1%
3.41
Kannika Torres
12W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Gina Dell
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Amy Yazdanpour
64W–54L career · 2 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
Vinata Vedam-Mai
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
Patricia Carek
15W–12L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.16
Lori Herman
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
18%81%<1%
3.12
Vicki Johnson
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Helen Ingmarsson
42W–46L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%67%32%
2.94
Marisa McLeod
81W–60L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.