Teams

LEBTC GREEN

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

6 players · average NTRP 2.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-29vs GR BLUESplit 11
W#1 SinglesDeborah Cartwright vs Jennifer Black6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Termaat / Rochelle Piro vs Libby Donohue / Gail Martin2-6, 5-7
2024-05-22vs BM BLUEWon 20
W#1 SinglesSuzanne Termaat vs Elizabeth Riggs6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLuAnn Wadman / Deborah Cartwright vs Dina Burgess / Sarah Chapman0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-05-15vs SS-LGT BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesKathy Stommel / Suzanne Termaat vs Rachel Austin / Jennifer Mell7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2024-05-08vs BCST REDWon 20
W#1 SinglesDeborah Cartwright vs Ann Symalla6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Termaat / LuAnn Wadman vs Kathleen Antony / Ann Freimuth6-1, 6-2
2024-05-01vs KC-CC BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Termaat / Deborah Cartwright vs Brooke Wright / Jennifer DHaenens0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLuAnn Wadman vs Lacey McMurry5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-24vs KC-CC YELLOWWon 10
W#1 DoublesLuAnn Wadman / Deborah Cartwright vs Lisa Benhammou-Osur / Kathleen Wilhite6-4, 6-1
2024-04-17vs RHCC REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesLuAnn Wadman / Kathy Stommel vs Shannen Major / Kolleen Konecny1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.56
Suzanne Termaat
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.53
Deborah Cartwright
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.42
LuAnn Wadman
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.38
Kathy Stommel
published
2.14
Lori Ashberg
published
2.04
Rochelle Piro
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

LuAnn Wadman + Suzanne Termaat181154% games+7.3% vs expected
Suzanne Termaat + Deborah Cartwright12953% games−2.5% vs expected
LuAnn Wadman + Deborah Cartwright4155% gamesnot enough data
Lori Ashberg + Kathy Stommel213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Suzanne Termaat
89W–62L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%34%66%
2.56
3
Deborah Cartwright
42W–24L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
2.53
2.5
LuAnn Wadman
71W–70L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%73%27%
2.42
Kathy Stommel
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%81%19%
2.38
Lori Ashberg
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Rochelle Piro
5W–12L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.