← Teams

LOTC-Mayer/Jaffe

2019 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.7 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Alan Kaplan
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.62
Howard Jaffe
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.42
Kevin Semonsen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Tim Brink
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Michael Lavios
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Results14 ties
2020-02-01Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesTim Brink / Perry Sides vs Richard Nagy / Gregory Morton7-5, 7-5
2020-01-31Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesPerry Sides / Tim Brink vs Joshua Bell / Thomas Darby7-5, 6-1
2020-01-31Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesTim Brink / Perry Sides vs Bob Greene / Al Latta6-1, 6-3
2019-09-15Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesTim Brink / Perry Sides vs John Popplewell / Tim Leatherman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2019-09-13Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesTim Brink / Perry Sides vs Dennis Salveson / Jim Benge7-6, 7-6
2019-09-12Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesTim Brink / Perry Sides vs Greg Brizendine / Jim Kellogg6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2019-04-05Lost 0–2
L#1 SinglesHoward Jaffe vs David O'Brien6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKevin Semonsen / Adam Silverblatt vs Jim Young / Chris Thoman6-3, 6-1
2019-03-01Won 3–0
W#1 SinglesHoward Jaffe vs Mahendra Shewalla6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAlan Kaplan vs Tak Hirano5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Lavios / Kyle Newman vs Vidyanand Kulkarni / Mosur Mohan6-1, 6-1
2019-02-22Lost 0–2
L#1 SinglesHoward Jaffe vs Honorato Wenceslao6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTim Brink / Kyle Newman vs Chris Stark / Jaap Sparrius6-2, 6-3
2019-02-17Won 2–1
W#1 SinglesHoward Jaffe vs Steve Eggerts6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesAlan Kaplan vs John Droege6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTim Brink / Mike Robertson vs David Greenberg / Shaun Anderson6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2019-02-08Lost 1–2
L#1 SinglesMichael Lavios vs Sean Santora4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTim Brink / Kevin Semonsen vs Mark Crimin / Scott Crimin6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAlan Kaplan vs Jason Franz6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2019-02-02Won 3–0
W#1 SinglesHoward Jaffe vs NITIN Nair6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMichael Lavios / Alan Kaplan vs Vivek Kashyap / Nagaraj Sathyanarayan6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTim Brink / Adam Silverblatt vs Sommay Pathammavong / Vidyanand Kulkarni6-2, 6-0
2019-01-11Lost 1–3
W#1 SinglesHoward Jaffe vs Ross Williams6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPaul Garry / Kevin Semonsen vs Scott Eliason / Joshua Hamblin7-5, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMichael Lavios vs Kevin Bui6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTim Brink / David Vedder vs Min Lee / Dave Vinik6-1, 6-0
2019-01-05Won 2–0
W#1 SinglesHoward Jaffe vs Kevin Bui5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTim Brink / Kyle Newman vs David Richardson / Warren Sadrin6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Alan Kaplan
11W–13L career
not enough data
—
4
Howard Jaffe
23W–29L career · type S
16%84%0%
3.62
3.5
Kevin Semonsen
48W–44L career
0%91%9%
3.42
3.5
Tim Brink
43W–26L career · type A
3%85%12%
3.35
3.5
Michael Lavios
30W–56L career
2%89%8%
3.33

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.