Teams

KC-RH RED

2024 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · MEN 6.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

9 players · average NTRP 2.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-31vs LTFC REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesReed Haddock / Terry McDaniel vs Kevin Gilson / John Latta3-6, 1-6
2024-07-24vs DTC PURPLEWon 10
W#2 DoublesDan Strietelmeier / Reed Haddock vs Zig Berzins / John Gordon6-3, 6-0
2024-07-17vs CK REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesReed Haddock / Dan Strietelmeier vs John Lawson / Steve Dallman6-2, 6-1
2024-07-10vs NJ ORANGELost 01
L#2 DoublesAlan Harris / Reed Haddock vs Mike Stewart / Leon Gonzales4-6, 4-6
2024-07-03vs MC REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesReed Haddock / Dan Strietelmeier vs David Valenciano / Tom Seeton6-2, 6-4
2024-06-26vs LTFC REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesDan Strietelmeier / Alan Harris vs Gordon Carpenter / Michael Smith3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 6.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Randy Rosenburg
published
2.82
Gary Farmar
published 3
2.73
Dan Strietelmeier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Lance Willoughby
published
2.65
J Douglas Wilson
published 2.5
2.63
Reed Haddock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Terry McDaniel
published
2.52
Howard McGee
published 3
Larry Hay
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Randy Rosenburg + Terry McDaniel3845% games+4.3% vs expected
J Douglas Wilson + Terry McDaniel4547% games+3.6% vs expected
Reed Haddock + Dan Strietelmeier10458% games−2.2% vs expected
J Douglas Wilson + Lance Willoughby4546% games−3.9% vs expected
Lance Willoughby + Randy Rosenburg11554% games−5.7% vs expected
J Douglas Wilson + Larry Hay3252% gamesnot enough data
Howard McGee + Terry McDaniel224 matchesnot enough data
Lance Willoughby + Terry McDaniel314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Randy Rosenburg
57W–44L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Gary Farmar
26W–32L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Dan Strietelmeier
58W–64L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
Lance Willoughby
37W–28L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.68
2.5
J Douglas Wilson
28W–31L career · no lines in 2024
0%12%88%
2.65
3
Reed Haddock
77W–64L career · 5 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
2.63
Terry McDaniel
31W–41L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Howard McGee
7W–18L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
2.52
Larry Hay
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.