Teams

Bangtson & Beebe: Lifetime

2025 IA 18 & Over Adult League · 3.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.44 / IOWA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-17vs IA/Cownie/Whipp/18&Over3.5WLost 05
L#1 DoublesAnn Mincks / Karin Beschen vs Anne Pham / Ann Stahly6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesHolli Keshwani vs Keren Terry3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDana McBratney / Donna Haager vs Christy Cownie / Casey Claypool2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAnna Lam vs Calla Whipp1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCheryl Reich-Bohnenkamp / Sarah Graf vs Eva Anderson / Britt Bremner3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-02-08vs IA/Cownie/Whipp/18&Over3.5WLost 14
L#1 DoublesKarin Beschen / Ann Mincks vs Calla Whipp / Ann Stahly2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAnna Lam vs Anne Pham0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHuafeng Shi / Jane Terry vs Casey Claypool / Patty Avilez2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKristine Chung vs Keren Terry0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Graf / Dionne Richards vs Eva Anderson / Karen Braud6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Ann Mincks
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.38
Sarah Graf
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Kristine Chung
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Donna Haager
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Huafeng Shi
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Laura Draganov
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Jane Terry
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Holli Keshwani
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Karin Beschen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Anna Lam
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Jessica Malloy
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Megan Beebe
published
3.07
Dana McBratney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Cheryl Reich-Bohnenkamp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Pam Bangtson
published
3.00
Nancy Cobb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Stephanie Anania
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Dionne Richards
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Draganov + Holli Keshwani6258% games+18.6% vs expected
Ann Mincks + Karin Beschen6464% games+16.6% vs expected
Sarah Graf + Dionne Richards5261% games+5.9% vs expected
Cheryl Reich-Bohnenkamp + Megan Beebe2340% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Cobb + Dionne Richards4160% gamesnot enough data
Megan Beebe + Ann Mincks4156% gamesnot enough data
Kristine Chung + Huafeng Shi224 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Graf + Karin Beschen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann Mincks
45W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
Sarah Graf
39W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.38
Kristine Chung
21W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Donna Haager
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Huafeng Shi
17W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Laura Draganov
27W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.22
Jane Terry
20W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Holli Keshwani
29W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
3.13
Karin Beschen
40W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.13
3.5
Anna Lam
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.08
Jessica Malloy
9W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Megan Beebe
15W–15L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Dana McBratney
11W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Cheryl Reich-Bohnenkamp
9W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.06
Pam Bangtson
34W–26L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Nancy Cobb
17W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
Stephanie Anania
38W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Dionne Richards
56W–67L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.