Teams

MEMPK ABELLO

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-20vs MEMPK GOLDSTEINWon 20
W#1 DoublesGregory Smith / Vincent Lopez vs Andy Field / Hamid Mortazavi6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPhil Abello / John Swarmer vs Clay Enoch / Daniel Schultz6-3, 6-4
2021-07-13vs GOG ENGELAGEWon 10
W#1 DoublesVincent Lopez / Gregory Smith vs Matthew Chang / Philip Erickson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-07-06vs CSRC GUNTERSplit 11
W#1 DoublesVincent Lopez / Gregory Smith vs Brian Renga / Kevin Wells7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRande Short / Phil Abello vs Craig Gaydos / Matthew Ehrlin3-6, 3-6
2021-06-29vs LTFCS VANDEVEERSplit 11
W#1 DoublesVincent Lopez / Gregory Smith vs David Clipsham / Patrick Barrett6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPhil Abello / Loren Nelson vs Erik Hansen / Derek Wheeler4-6, 0-6
2021-06-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesPhil Abello / Thomas Shea vs Denny Nicholas / Bob Thompson7-6, 6-3
2021-06-15vs MEMPK GOLDSTEINWon 20
W#1 DoublesVincent Lopez / Gregory Smith vs John Tompkins / Clay Enoch6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPhil Abello / Loren Nelson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-06-08vs GOG ENGELAGELost 01
L#1 DoublesVincent Lopez / Gregory Smith vs Mark McDowell / Trent Glaser6-2, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Gregory Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Vincent Lopez
published
3.15
Phil Abello
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.93
Rande Short
published
Geoffrey Rutecki
published
Joe Zalewski
published
John Swarmer
published
Joseph Schiff
published
Loren Nelson
published
Thomas Shea
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gregory Smith + Vincent Lopez6351% games−3.7% vs expected
Gregory Smith + Phil Abello4259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gregory Smith
80W–36L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.42
Vincent Lopez
68W–32L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
Phil Abello
37W–38L career · 5 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
Rande Short
12W–18L career · no lines in 2021
71%29%<1%
2.93
Geoffrey Rutecki
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Joe Zalewski
4W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
John Swarmer
12W–27L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Joseph Schiff
3W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Loren Nelson
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Thomas Shea
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.