Teams

EM YELLOW

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.58 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-03vs CHCC BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichele Olree / Melissa Zink vs Vanessa Ramich / Stacey Knox4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesKatie Gaeth vs Ann Marie Johnson6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAndrea Horan / Sarah Horan vs Elizabeth Morton / Brooke O'Donnell6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-27vs SSH REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichele Olree / Colley Moe vs Stacey Miller / Corinne Flemister4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKatie Gaeth vs Megan McMorris2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAndrea Horan / Melissa Zink vs Kathy Hoskins / Lisa Chirico6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-20vs PTC BLUEWon 32
W#1 DoublesColley Moe / Ruth Rohs vs Joy Coulter-Brown / Juliana Daugherty6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKimberley Silverman vs Christina Good6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Mathis / Michele Olree vs Brooke Leer / Tracy Pursell4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesSamantha Hanson vs Penny Malloy6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesGayle Gaeth / Katie Gaeth vs Erika Shorter / Shannon Kleinbach4-6, 1-6
2021-05-13vs GCC NAVYLost 05
L#1 DoublesSamantha Hanson / Mary Mathis vs Andrea Carrington / Merry Logan2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKimberley Silverman vs Jennifer Rodriguez4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAshley Wolfe / Michele Olree vs Andrea Howland - Cobb / Rima Hea3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesKate Bangs vs Ronit Hicks7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAndrea Horan / Sarah Horan vs Amy Reilly / Brooke Beasley6-7, 4-6
2021-05-12vs GAC GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRuth Rohs / Melissa Zink vs Lindsey Carpenter / Stephanie Gschwendtner3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGayle Gaeth / Katie Gaeth vs Debra Benge / Tricia Wright6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2021-04-29vs LTFC REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesColley Moe / Ashley Wolfe vs Maria Orozco / Heather McGinnis6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMichele Olree / Kimberley Silverman vs Robyn Larkin / Amy Handlin6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2021-04-22vs CACM PINKLost 13
L#1 DoublesMelissa Zink / Colley Moe vs Karla Simons / Bev Morrow4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSamantha Hanson / Mary Mathis vs Lisa Snider / Melanie Darden3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKimberley Silverman vs Courtney Forman4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesGayle Gaeth / Katie Gaeth vs Caren Misky / Juli Bulloch2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Melissa Zink
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.48
Katie Gaeth
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.47
Colley Moe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Ashley Wolfe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Mary Mathis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Michele Olree
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.58
Andrea Horan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Gayle Gaeth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kate Bangs
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Kimberley Silverman
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Ruth Rohs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Samantha Hanson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sarah Horan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Colley Moe + Ruth Rohs2357% games+5.5% vs expected
Michele Olree + Kimberley Silverman3349% games+3.9% vs expected
Melissa Zink + Colley Moe12562% games+3.4% vs expected
Colley Moe + Michele Olree121253% games+1.5% vs expected
Colley Moe + Ashley Wolfe10949% games−0.4% vs expected
Mary Mathis + Michele Olree2349% games−2.0% vs expected
Melissa Zink + Michele Olree71152% games−2.0% vs expected
Samantha Hanson + Mary Mathis111047% games−2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Melissa Zink
107W–81L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Katie Gaeth
16W–30L career · 5 lines in 2021
57%43%<1%
3.48
3.5
Colley Moe
63W–75L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Ashley Wolfe
49W–55L career · type A · 1 line in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.16
Mary Mathis
39W–60L career · 3 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Michele Olree
89W–143L career · 5 lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.12
3
Andrea Horan
25W–51L career · 3 lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
2.58
Gayle Gaeth
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kate Bangs
28W–13L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Kimberley Silverman
34W–35L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Ruth Rohs
8W–13L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Samantha Hanson
37W–30L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sarah Horan
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.