Teams

TStefan-HS

2026 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Eve

15 players · average NTRP 3.23 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 16 8:00 PM
Hollow Rock Racquet Club
Sep 23 7:00 PM
Hardscrabble
Sep 30 6:30 PM
Southern Boundaries Tennis Courts
2026-09-09vs MKuehn-DFCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMillicent Snow / Shira Katsir vs Colleen Cowperthwait / Adriana Doi1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDonna Spero / Lori Sloan vs Meta Kuehn / Jeanne Murray6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLaura Webb-Murrah / Melissa Provost vs Sarah Parker / Diane Allen6-7, 2-6
2026-09-02vs MGriffiths-CHTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesDonna Spero / Altagracia Evert vs Meghan Smith / Lizzy Burch6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Pfeiffer / Tynita Edwards vs Celina Morice / Thi My Tho Rogers1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Webb-Murrah / Linda Nagelhout vs Yvonne Acker / Mary Griffiths5-7, 1-6
2026-08-26vs JDeConto.40.6.5C-DURWon 21
W#1 DoublesDonna Spero / Jennifer Hoffmann vs Amanda Alexander Klein / Kelly Travis6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMillie Hunter / Lori Sloan vs Julie DeConto / Becki Cleveland0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAltagracia Evert / Shira Katsir vs Katie Villegas / Thuy Brooks6-1, 6-1
2026-08-12vs RDavis-CHTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesDonna Spero / Mary Macdonald vs Melissa Fitzpatrick / Sarah Ederle4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Pfeiffer / Tynita Edwards vs Kelly Jarrett / Ai-Jiuan Wu1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMillie Hunter / Kathy Holt vs Regina Davis / Amy Lynch5-7, 0-6
2026-08-05vs SBartle.40C-DURWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Macdonald / Millicent Snow vs Kim Goll / Carin von Kahr6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAltagracia Evert / Donna Spero vs Bay Scott / Liz Schaller6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTynita Edwards / Laura Webb-Murrah vs Shannon Bartle / Susan Parent6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Eve
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MGriffiths-CHTC3090135
2KMcWhorter-DUR3081234
3RDavis-CHTC2060030
4LCaldwell.40.6.5C-SVC2163656
5MKuehn-DFC2163880
6SStowe.40.6.5C-SVC2154855
7SGraff.40.6.5C-Dur2163978
8JDeConto.40.6.5C-DUR2154972
9TStefan-HS1133652
10MFulton-UNC12361391
11CMurray-HR12271486
12GLofrese.40.6.5-TOCH02151066
13LGilchrist-CHCC03271499
14KRyan-HVCC031817105
15SBartle.40C-DUR030918112

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Donna Spero
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
Millicent Snow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Laura Webb-Murrah
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Millie Hunter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.93
Andrea Pfeiffer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.90
Tracy Stefan
published
2.85
Mary Macdonald
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Altagracia Evert
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Anne Redmond
published 3
2.76
Lori Sloan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Shira Katsir
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Melissa Provost
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Linda Nagelhout
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Tynita Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.49
Kathy Holt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Millicent Snow + Altagracia Evert5357% games+10.7% vs expected
Melissa Provost + Kathy Holt1443% games−3.4% vs expected
Linda Nagelhout + Kathy Holt2543% games−15.2% vs expected
Altagracia Evert + Tynita Edwards5163% gamesnot enough data
Laura Webb-Murrah + Millicent Snow2355% gamesnot enough data
Laura Webb-Murrah + Donna Spero314 matchesnot enough data
Donna Spero + Altagracia Evert134 matchesnot enough data
Altagracia Evert + Tracy Stefan224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Donna Spero
33W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Millicent Snow
68W–58L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Laura Webb-Murrah
110W–119L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Millie Hunter
64W–65L career · 2 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
3.5
Andrea Pfeiffer
73W–146L career · 2 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.93
Tracy Stefan
25W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.90
Mary Macdonald
25W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Altagracia Evert
74W–69L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Anne Redmond
18W–26L career · no lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
Lori Sloan
4W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Shira Katsir
32W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Melissa Provost
9W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Linda Nagelhout
45W–68L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Tynita Edwards
100W–92L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
2.64
3
Kathy Holt
25W–63L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.