Teams

Sudduth/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-20vs Avant/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlison Elkington / Rebekah Sudduth vs Lauren Parks / Lindsey Myers6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJanie Beanblossom vs Catherine Lackie6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKaci Turner / Laura Connerley vs Anna Avant / Brittany Glisson6-3, 6-2
2024-10-23vs Galdieri/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlison Elkington / Mary Marshall Fenton vs Candace Askew / Kelly Baker6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesFrannie Franks vs Chelsea Jewell7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTaylor Weston / Morgan Ray vs Bobbie Wonderly McLaughlin / Liza Easley6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-10-16vs Witte/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesMary Marshall Fenton / Kaci Turner vs Kelly Irvine / Keli Brand4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKaren Weissinger vs Anna Witte6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSarah Reed / Janie Beanblossom vs Laura Weaver / Rachel Montague2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-10-02vs Carkeet/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Weissinger / Frannie Franks vs Leigh Ann Carkeet / Erin Mullis6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMary Marshall Fenton vs Rebekah Molnar6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJanie Beanblossom / Morgan Ray vs Lin Fryman / Autumn Peterson6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Alison Elkington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Mary Marshall Fenton
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.59
Janie Beanblossom
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.58
Kaci Turner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.55
Rebekah Sudduth
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.50
Frannie Franks
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.17
Laura Connerley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.98
Taylor Weston
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Weissinger
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Morgan Ray
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alison Elkington + Janie Beanblossom123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alison Elkington
16W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Mary Marshall Fenton
11W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
Janie Beanblossom
7W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.59
Kaci Turner
11W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.58
Rebekah Sudduth
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Frannie Franks
8W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
Laura Connerley
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Taylor Weston
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Karen Weissinger
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Morgan Ray
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.