Teams

A to Z

2025 Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.69 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-08vs Net NinjasWon 10
W#1 DoublesELIZE Rumley / Dane Markell vs Fred Lief / Sarah Gillstrom6-3, 6-0
2024-12-07vs Volley LlamasWon 10
W#1 DoublesELIZE Rumley / Dane Markell vs Linda Westwick / Jeremy Conkling6-3, 6-4
2024-11-09vs Team 8.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesApril Korshin / Dane Markell vs David Leclair / Trena Rairdon6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichelle Rothoff / Adam Choi vs Marlys Morton / Sinclair Jackson3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAllen Clendaniel / Susan Brunner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-26vs Volley LlamasLost 03
L#1 DoublesApril Korshin / Allen Clendaniel vs Catherine Stone / John Carlson6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Brunner / Preecha Pongphai vs Allison Erickson / Ryan Jaramillo2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Rothoff / Adam Choi vs Linda Westwick / Jeremy Conkling0-6, 1-6
2024-10-19vs Team 8.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAllen Clendaniel / April Korshin vs Alice Knapp / Lior Dolgonos6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPreecha Pongphai / Zareena Clendaniel vs Lucille Abe / Jay Green6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesELIZE Rumley / Adam Choi vs David Leclair / Triin Minton2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
April Korshin
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
Dane Markell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Allen Clendaniel
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.67
ELIZE Rumley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.52
Michelle Rothoff
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.34
Adam Choi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Zareena Clendaniel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.02
Susan Brunner
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Preecha Pongphai
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allen Clendaniel + April Korshin8261% gamesnot enough data
Allen Clendaniel + Zareena Clendaniel01029% gamesnot enough data
ELIZE Rumley + Dane Markell314 matchesnot enough data
April Korshin + Dane Markell033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
April Korshin
113W–101L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Dane Markell
61W–29L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Allen Clendaniel
84W–53L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
3.5
ELIZE Rumley
56W–59L career · type M · 3 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.67
4
Michelle Rothoff
12W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Adam Choi
69W–37L career · type S · 6 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Zareena Clendaniel
58W–96L career · type M · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Susan Brunner
112W–99L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Preecha Pongphai
13W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.