Teams

2022 Womens 40 & Over 4.5- Riviera

Adult 40 & Over 2022 · Adult Womens 40 & Over 4.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.36 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesMarisell Santos / Ruth Rivera vs Marianna Miraldi Conde / Sherly Pagan6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAna Leal vs Sherly Pagan6-3, 6-4
L#1 DoublesCristi Soto / Ana Leal vs Tatiana Alonso / Marianna Miraldi Conde6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Santiago / Ruth Rivera vs Damaris Vega / Sofia Camilo6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesFrances Filardi / Ruth Rivera vs Sofia Camilo / Joan Rodriguez7-5, 6-3
W#1 DoublesMichelle Santiago / Ruth Rivera vs Tatiana Alonso / Marianna Miraldi Conde6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesFrances Filardi / Ana Leal vs Luissette Goyco / Aida Yazmine Rivera6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesMichelle Santiago / Ruth Rivera vs Blanca Montalvo / Sherly Pagan6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRoxana Kiss / Ruth Rivera vs Damaris Vega / Aida Yazmine Rivera6-2, 6-2
W#1 DoublesRuth Rivera / Ana Leal vs Aidamari Disdier / Lisa Baldrich6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Womens 40 & Over 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.17 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Ana Leal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.31
Penelope Feliciano
published
Adele Lecaroz
published 4.5
Cristi Soto
published 4.5
4.23
Ruth Rivera
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.22
Carmen Jimenez
published 4.5
4.16
Anita Rivera
published 4
4.16
Roxana Kiss
published
4.11
Michelle Santiago
published
3.75
Marisell Santos
published
Frances Filardi
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roxana Kiss + Ruth Rivera4453% games−0.0% vs expected
Penelope Feliciano + Carmen Jimenez2348% games−7.4% vs expected
Ruth Rivera + Michelle Santiago123 matchesnot enough data
Marisell Santos + Michelle Santiago213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ana Leal
73W–39L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
4.40
Penelope Feliciano
20W–22L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Adele Lecaroz
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Cristi Soto
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Ruth Rivera
77W–44L career · 7 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Carmen Jimenez
14W–22L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.22
4
Anita Rivera
26W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%11%89%
4.16
Roxana Kiss
18W–19L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
4.16
Michelle Santiago
15W–12L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11
Marisell Santos
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
97%3%<1%
3.75
4
Frances Filardi
9W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.