Teams

GTC-Farnham

2022 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 4.17 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Huong Lakin
published 4.5
3.80
Cheryl Farnham
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.73
Debbie Short
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Results5 ties
2022-08-12Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSally Devine Wright / Debbie Short vs Sandy Garry / Carol Woolman6-2, 6-1
2021-12-04Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Berghoff / Cheryl Farnham vs Renee Peterson / Deborah Elsbree Herron7-5, 7-5
2021-11-19Split 11
W#2 DoublesCheryl Farnham / Dora Karch vs Sally Devine Wright / Lisa Politeo7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDebbie Short / Linda Johnson vs Patricia Dorsey / Deborah Elsbree Herron6-4, 6-0
2021-10-30Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCheryl Farnham / Huong Lakin vs Patricia Dorsey / Beth Perrow6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2021-10-02Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLinda Berghoff / Debbie Short vs Renee Peterson / Theresa Helland6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCheryl Farnham / Lisa Kim vs Patricia Dorsey / Beth Perrow6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Huong Lakin
11W–3L career
not enough data
4
Cheryl Farnham
76W–162L career
0%99%1%
3.80
4
Debbie Short
31W–36L career
2%98%0%
3.73

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.